From owner-freebsd-advocacy Tue Jul 13 14:34: 2 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mail.ftf.dk (mail.ftf.net [129.142.64.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07D561507D; Tue, 13 Jul 1999 14:33:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from regnauld@ftf.net) Received: from ns.int.ftf.net (fw2.ftf.dk [192.168.1.2] (may be forged)) by mail.ftf.dk (8.9.3/8.9.3/gw-ftf-1.2) with ESMTP id XAA07210; Tue, 13 Jul 1999 23:32:03 +0200 (CEST) X-Authentication-Warning: mail.ftf.dk: Host fw2.ftf.dk [192.168.1.2] (may be forged) claimed to be ns.int.ftf.net Received: (from regnauld@localhost) by ns.int.ftf.net (8.9.2/8.9.3) id XAA18957; Tue, 13 Jul 1999 23:46:08 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <19990713234608.05117@ns.int.ftf.net> Date: Tue, 13 Jul 1999 23:46:08 +0200 From: Phil Regnauld To: Brett Glass Cc: Lanny Baron , cjclark@home.com, Paul Anderson , ulairi@jps.net, freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG, advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: NT vs Linux vs FreeBSD References: <199907030108.VAA24907@cc942873-a.ewndsr1.nj.home.com> <4.2.0.58.19990713151423.0447bc20@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.88e In-Reply-To: <4.2.0.58.19990713151423.0447bc20@localhost>; from Brett Glass on Tue, Jul 13, 1999 at 03:14:57PM -0600 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 3.1-RELEASE i386 Organization: FTFnet Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Brett Glass writes: > At 11:30 AM 7/3/99 -0400, Lanny Baron wrote: > > > >In addition to FreeBSD being rock solid, it has the right to claim that it > >is a one distribution OS. Unlike linux which has several. > > Ever hear of Cheap Bytes? Err... Who engineers the releases for the Cheap Bytes ? They're the same bits as the WC Cdrom. You're confusing distribution, media and packaging, IMHO. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message