From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Wed Feb 8 13:53:40 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AABEECD632C for ; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 13:53:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ronald-lists@klop.ws) Received: from smarthost1.greenhost.nl (smarthost1.greenhost.nl [195.190.28.81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7554EE94 for ; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 13:53:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ronald-lists@klop.ws) Received: from smtp.greenhost.nl ([213.108.104.138]) by smarthost1.greenhost.nl with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cbSgg-0001bo-DE; Wed, 08 Feb 2017 14:53:34 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, "Lee Damon" Subject: Re: FBSD 10.3 + ZFS + Sun x4500 = utter lock up. References: <44ecebcb-fb48-d828-7f08-47a981b732d2@castle.org> Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2017 14:53:33 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "Ronald Klop" Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <44ecebcb-fb48-d828-7f08-47a981b732d2@castle.org> User-Agent: Opera Mail/12.16 (FreeBSD) X-Authenticated-As-Hash: 398f5522cb258ce43cb679602f8cfe8b62a256d1 X-Virus-Scanned: by clamav at smarthost1.samage.net X-Spam-Level: ++ X-Spam-Score: 2.6 X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.6 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED, BAYES_50, FUZZY_XPILL autolearn=disabled version=3.4.0 X-Scan-Signature: f4db13d1ab50da585241c80c5e12767b X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2017 13:53:40 -0000 At work we used to run such a machine with 9.1 and 10.2. My colleague tells me 10.3 gave errors, but he does not remember what. The machine is not in use anymore, because of other upgrades, so I can't verify for you. Any reason not to try 11? I don't know if it fixes anything, but it would be a nice data point for comparison. Ronald. On Tue, 07 Feb 2017 22:44:01 +0100, Lee Damon wrote: > FreeBSD [redacted] 10.3-STABLE FreeBSD 10.3-STABLE #2 r313008: Tue Jan > 31 01:50:49 PST 2017 lvd@[redacted]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC > amd64 > > I'm trying to get FBSD 10.3 working on a Sun x4500 (don't ask) for use > as a ZFS-based backup server. However, whenever any amount of data is > put into a zpool and then zpool scrub is run the host locks up hard. On > reboot it complains that a "Hyper transport sync flood occurred". > > I found > https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2012-January/065542.html > which seems to match but when I try the cpuset command mentioned there I > get an error: > > ; sudo cpuset -c -l 0 -x 58 > cpuset: setaffinity: Invalid argument > > Looks like the -c was invalid. After removing that I was informed -x 58 > wasn't valid. Sure enough, there's no mpt0 or IRQ 58 on the host: > > ; vmstat -i > interrupt total rate > irq17: ohci2 8578 2 > irq18: ohci3 473 0 > irq19: ohci0 ohci1+ 4924 1 > irq24: mvs0 457 0 > irq32: mvs1 453 0 > irq38: mvs2 451 0 > irq46: mvs3 8063 1 > irq52: em0 152354 35 > irq53: em1 140 0 > irq68: mvs4 450 0 > irq76: mvs5 454 0 > cpu0:timer 208311 48 > cpu1:timer 98318 23 > cpu2:timer 105704 24 > cpu3:timer 106202 24 > Total 695332 162 > > Looking around with some help from #freebsd on efnet I found mvs0-5 > which are connected to the Marvel drive controllers on the host. I then > used > ; sudo cpuset -l 0 -x ## > where I replaced ## with 24, 32, 38, 46, 68, and 76. > > After rebuilding the zpool I started writing to it. It took a lot less > time to crash - I didn't even need to run zpool scrub - but instead of > completely locking up it just rebooted. I did not see reference to the > hyper transport problem while watching it boot but given the poor > performance of the serial console I can't be 100% sure it wasn't there. > > So now I turn here to ask for guidance. Is anyone currently successfully > running 10.x on a x4500 and if so, how are you doing it? If not, how can > I get this working? > > thanks, > nomad > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"