From owner-freebsd-numerics@freebsd.org Wed Nov 8 17:11:23 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-numerics@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED53BE5829A for ; Wed, 8 Nov 2017 17:11:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu [128.95.76.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "troutmask", Issuer "troutmask" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C1F261D73 for ; Wed, 8 Nov 2017 17:11:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id vA8HBMLP056154 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 8 Nov 2017 09:11:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: (from sgk@localhost) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id vA8HBMKD056153; Wed, 8 Nov 2017 09:11:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sgk) Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2017 09:11:22 -0800 From: Steve Kargl To: Dima Pasechnik Cc: "Montgomery-Smith, Stephen" , Eitan Adler , "freebsd-numerics@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: cpow and clog Message-ID: <20171108171122.GA56093@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Reply-To: sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu References: <20171106194937.GA87725@freebird> <20171106204121.GB37361@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20171106213308.GA73787@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20171108061501.GA51059@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20171108150302.GA53567@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20171108150302.GA53567@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.2 (2016-11-26) X-BeenThere: freebsd-numerics@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussions of high quality implementation of libm functions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2017 17:11:24 -0000 On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 07:03:02AM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote: > On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 11:00:40AM +0000, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > > > A patch not tagged by a version control system surely rots very quickly, > > as noone except the submitter knows the exact state of the source tree it > > is made against, especially if the tree is also not under a revision > > control system. > > And surely the submitter's memory is not perfect, either. > > The patch is against trunk on the day it was submitted. > The patch was created under the officical revision control > system used by FreeBSD. > Hmmm. Just looked at the patch in bugzilla. The top four lines are Index: include/complex.h =================================================================== --- include/complex.h (revision 313777) +++ include/complex.h (working copy) So, the patchs tagged with the revision number. HTH -- Steve