From owner-freebsd-current Mon Jun 23 14:22:12 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id OAA01320 for current-outgoing; Mon, 23 Jun 1997 14:22:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from phaeton.artisoft.com (phaeton.Artisoft.COM [198.17.250.50]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id OAA01310 for ; Mon, 23 Jun 1997 14:22:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from terry@localhost) by phaeton.artisoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id OAA01692; Mon, 23 Jun 1997 14:10:27 -0700 From: Terry Lambert Message-Id: <199706232110.OAA01692@phaeton.artisoft.com> Subject: Re: Activehome X10 Interface To: smp@csn.net (Steve Passe) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 1997 14:10:27 -0700 (MST) Cc: terry@lambert.org, jseger@freebsd.scds.com, current@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <199706232053.OAA07518@Ilsa.StevesCafe.com> from "Steve Passe" at Jun 23, 97 02:53:15 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > > could this be the post you are thinking of? > > > > Yes. > > I'm really too busy right now to look this code over in detail, but a quick > scan failed to find any specific handling of the RI line from the activehome. > I think this code polls the serial input every two seconds instead, which > is what I suggest avoiding. For background the activehome expects that the > PC may be turned off, and tries to get its attention via the RI line. I'm > proposing that the proper solution is to attach RI to DCD, and use a signal > catcher for SIGHUP to notice when the activehome has data instead of > polling the activehome. This makes sense... RI is frequently used to wake up "green" machines in "standby" or other APM power-save modes. Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.