From owner-freebsd-security Mon Aug 23 11:39: 9 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3790F14E9D for ; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 11:39:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA70271; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 12:36:55 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id MAA40646; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 12:37:35 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <199908231837.MAA40646@harmony.village.org> To: Christopher Petrilli Subject: Re: VPN for FreeBSD 2.2.8 and 3.2 Cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG, avalon@coombs.anu.edu.au In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 22 Aug 1999 23:43:51 EDT." <19990822234351.D18458@amber.org> References: <19990822234351.D18458@amber.org> <19990822231452.A18458@amber.org> <199908230336.NAA21519@cheops.anu.edu.au> Date: Mon, 23 Aug 1999 12:37:35 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org In message <19990822234351.D18458@amber.org> Christopher Petrilli writes: : Is this flamebait really necessary? FreeBSD is hardly insecure, and for : 99.999999% of the situations, set up by a knowledgable administrator, is : every bit as secure as OpenBSD, or anything else. In the extreme edge cases, as well as for bundled crypto OpenBSD has a slight edge here. FreeBSD is certainly secure enough for most people's needs, and getting more so all the time. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message