From owner-svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 14 21:56:55 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04E0B4A0; Mon, 14 Jul 2014 21:56:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from shepard.synsport.net (mail.synsport.com [208.69.230.148]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC60727F0; Mon, 14 Jul 2014 21:56:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.22] (unknown [130.255.19.191]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by shepard.synsport.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFF4943B98; Mon, 14 Jul 2014 16:56:28 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <53C451FA.2020304@marino.st> Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 23:56:10 +0200 From: John Marino Reply-To: marino@freebsd.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Timur I. Bakeyev" , Steve Wills Subject: Re: svn commit: r361646 - in head/net/samba36: . files References: <201407122229.s6CMTN42057554@svn.freebsd.org> <53C322A7.2090705@marino.st> <20140714003112.GA54756@mouf.net> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: svn-ports-head , svn-ports-all , "ports-committers@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 21:56:55 -0000 On 7/14/2014 22:01, Timur I. Bakeyev wrote: > > You bumped PORTREVISION, although there wasn't any pkg list change - so > all the users now have to recompile not so tiny samba36 just to fix > shebang in one rarely used file. Kind of like being "almost" pregnant? If the contents of the package changes *at all* you are supposed to revbump, not just if the pkg-plist changes. It's not a judgement call -- if the file is important enough to be in the package, it's important enough to bump when it changes. John