From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Oct 18 20:37:25 1995 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id UAA13702 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 18 Oct 1995 20:37:25 -0700 Received: from rf900.physics.usyd.edu.au (rf900.physics.usyd.edu.au [129.78.129.109]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id UAA13656 for ; Wed, 18 Oct 1995 20:37:04 -0700 Received: (from dawes@localhost) by rf900.physics.usyd.edu.au (8.6.11/8.6.9) id NAA14948; Thu, 19 Oct 1995 13:30:37 +1000 From: David Dawes Message-Id: <199510190330.NAA14948@rf900.physics.usyd.edu.au> Subject: Re: xterm dumps core To: ache@astral.msk.su (=?KOI8-R?Q?=E1=CE=C4=D2=C5=CA_=FE=C5=D2=CE=CF=D7?=) Date: Thu, 19 Oct 1995 13:30:36 +1000 (EST) Cc: hackers@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: from "=?KOI8-R?Q?=E1=CE=C4=D2=C5=CA_=FE=C5=D2=CE=CF=D7?=" at Oct 19, 95 05:13:22 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] Content-Type: text Content-Length: 907 Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk >>Andrey should think about the consequences of upsetting thousands of >>previously happy FreeBSD users when they discover that the X that they've >>been using just fine for a year or more on FreeBSD 2.0/2.0.5 no longer >>works, with problems ranging from xterm dumping core to compose processing >>no longer working. > >X shipped on the same CD as FreeBSD and it is newer that >2.0/2.0.5 variant, so upgrading recommended in this case. >I already make neccessary locale.alias additions. Does this imply that the XFree86 shipped with 2.1 will contain the new names in locale.alias? If so, please do not call it simply "XFree86 3.1.2" because that will lead to confusion with the definitive 3.1.2 version, and cause problems for someone who wants to upgrade their source to a new version with a future patch. Please make it clear that it is a version updated to include support for FreeBSD 2.1. David