From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Mar 25 03:32:32 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D7CC1065670
	for <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed, 25 Mar 2009 03:32:32 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from das@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from zim.MIT.EDU (ZIM.MIT.EDU [18.95.3.101])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D40288FC15
	for <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed, 25 Mar 2009 03:32:31 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from das@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from zim.MIT.EDU (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by zim.MIT.EDU (8.14.3/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n2P3Yqjv017553;
	Tue, 24 Mar 2009 23:34:52 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from das@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: (from das@localhost)
	by zim.MIT.EDU (8.14.3/8.14.2/Submit) id n2P3YpdK017552;
	Tue, 24 Mar 2009 23:34:51 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from das@FreeBSD.ORG)
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 23:34:51 -0400
From: David Schultz <das@FreeBSD.ORG>
To: Gustau Perez <gperez@entel.upc.edu>
Message-ID: <20090325033451.GA17442@zim.MIT.EDU>
Mail-Followup-To: Gustau Perez <gperez@entel.upc.edu>,
	freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
References: <49C80DBA.80407@entel.upc.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <49C80DBA.80407@entel.upc.edu>
Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Inline definition problem in current
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 03:32:32 -0000

On Mon, Mar 23, 2009, Gustau Perez wrote:
>  a few time ago I switched to current, right now I've it updated to 
> yesterday.  While compiling some ports (in fact, building x11/gnome2) I 
> found that some of them (written in C) are using  some inline functions 
> (I guess it is because the compiler will replace the call to the 
> function with the function itself). The problem is that gcc fails with 
> the following message :
>        
>        error: nested function 'XXX' declared but never defined
> 
>   checking the code, the function is declared and then implemented in a 
> header file which is included in the offending .c file. The function is 
> declared as 'inline'. The only solution I found is to change the 
> definition to static.
> 
>   Checking pontyhat shows me that many ports are failing because of 
> this problem. What I can understand is why is this happening, because 
> the same ports compiles fine in STABLE and the compilers's version in 
> base seems to be the same (gcc (GCC) 4.2.1 20070719  [FreeBSD], the same 
> in current) 

Which other ports were broken for this reason?