From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 3 20:40:20 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8834116A48F for ; Wed, 3 May 2006 20:40:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88D6F43D48 for ; Wed, 3 May 2006 20:40:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k43KeJ8h093347 for ; Wed, 3 May 2006 20:40:19 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k43KeJGE093346; Wed, 3 May 2006 20:40:19 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 20:40:19 GMT Message-Id: <200605032040.k43KeJGE093346@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Vivek Khera Cc: Subject: Re: kern/94424: [bge] BGE5721 or BGE5750? X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Vivek Khera List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 May 2006 20:40:20 -0000 The following reply was made to PR kern/94424; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Vivek Khera To: "Internet Partners, Inc. Tech Support" Cc: Subject: Re: kern/94424: [bge] BGE5721 or BGE5750? Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 16:36:01 -0400 On May 3, 2006, at 3:24 PM, Internet Partners, Inc. Tech Support wrote: > > Please don't submit multiple PR's for the same bug without > referencing each > other, this is the same bug you filed on PR kern/94863 > No, these are two entirely separate issues on entirely separate machines. One is a Dell PE800 with chip ID 1659 which is inconsistently identified, and the other is getting an IBM e326m with chip ID 166a to work.