Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 14 Sep 2016 22:42:35 -0400 (EDT)
From:      Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
To:        Garrett Wollman <wollman@bimajority.org>, re@freebsd.org
Cc:        freebsd-security@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Heimdal in base
Message-ID:  <alpine.GSO.1.10.1609142241490.5272@multics.mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <22490.595.67496.130780@hergotha.csail.mit.edu>
References:  <86io5a9ome.fsf@desk.des.no> <56428E8A.3090201@FreeBSD.org> <56428F59.5010908@FreeBSD.org> <86y4e47uty.fsf@desk.des.no> <56436F4B.8050002@FreeBSD.org> <86r3jwfpiq.fsf@desk.des.no> <20151111181339.GE48728@zxy.spb.ru> <86io58flhk.fsf@desk.des.no> <20151111184448.GR31314@zxy.spb.ru> <CAGnMC6rMaY2a_F4qpxX4rB6n6n-tvijH74jxf8j94-2V8r_V8g@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.GSO.1.10.1511122120050.26829@multics.mit.edu> <86egfu9z0j.fsf@desk.des.no> <alpine.GSO.1.10.1609141511530.5272@multics.mit.edu> <22490.595.67496.130780@hergotha.csail.mit.edu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 14 Sep 2016, Garrett Wollman wrote:

> <<On Wed, 14 Sep 2016 15:21:46 -0400 (EDT), Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@MIT.EDU> said:
>
> > Well, it's definitely too late for 11, now.
>
> > But, Debian is preparing to remove their heimdal package entirely,
> > imminently: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=837728
>
[...]
>
> Since 11.0 hasn't been released yet, is it within the realm of
> possibility to officially deprecate Heimdal-in-base before it ships?
> At this stage all that would involve is putting an announcement in the
> release notes.

If you're going to propose that, asking re@ seems like the right things to
do.  Adding them to the recipient list...

-Ben



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.GSO.1.10.1609142241490.5272>