From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 2 11:15:08 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2B9E1065672; Mon, 2 May 2011 11:15:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 223C18FC1C; Mon, 2 May 2011 11:15:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyf23 with SMTP id 23so5403659wyf.13 for ; Mon, 02 May 2011 04:15:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=kt9zhlPWWTSrNOFhooaDUkR7HlW6GsVAtRHvJPnoBTg=; b=OS3ko779Ww+BP6vZM5v+M1GmVXRN4T3fHyb+mdfFde/8Aw6qOoa3V9FnZ2jRBbpmHY rYeHW6rBUguu6sR8sNjek9mm1R+P9ZP3DmBGwUGznHtOCVKDDuIGNH1j8zjMfGbxqMRb 0JgGANYTB5GOhETHTOT2Rcmbf+1HLsVr0dm6c= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type; b=ioB3/Wy79MVOIhx3Hqz3UFStYU8eXscADqhuM+xuDVWzdSXai1Ozu0BC2Cah1LSBg+ 1EknvtQdCCsCZ+lRq/noKUrnXvqc7PSEA+uU4Hda2RhoZFMiJXni558zhtXXx71HZhVd nMdjXflzpgW6GtvNEXkDZLnHHqC5m7X7XfjJY= Received: by 10.216.142.224 with SMTP id i74mr866682wej.3.1304334907039; Mon, 02 May 2011 04:15:07 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.243.143 with HTTP; Mon, 2 May 2011 04:14:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4DBE7373.2020808@FreeBSD.org> References: <4DBD0C24.4040305@FreeBSD.org> <4DBE7373.2020808@FreeBSD.org> From: Chris Rees Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 12:14:37 +0100 Message-ID: To: Matthias Andree Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: itetcu@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: expiration of net/skype ?! X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: utisoft@gmail.com List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 May 2011 11:15:09 -0000 On 2 May 2011 10:03, Matthias Andree wrote: > Am 02.05.2011 10:49, schrieb Chris Rees: > >>> or otherwise issue a hint >>> that the port is kept for the benefit of those who happen to have a >>> distfile. >> >> Which is what, thirty people? > > I don't care. Let's not deliberately break the port for those who can > still use it. > > Please remove the EXPIRATION_DATE; I'm also willing to "maintain" the > port if needed. > Although the port is already broken (no-one is deliberately breaking it), there is a possible (temporary) solution for those who want to use their own distfile. ITetcu, miwi, please would you have a look at [1]? It's partly lifted from the diablo ports; just makes it more convenient if one has the distfile already, as well as using IGNORE rather than BROKEN; we know it won't ever build. Chris [1] http://www.bayofrum.net/~crees/patches/skype-distfile.diff