From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org  Mon Feb 22 15:41:27 2016
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD419AB0B6F
 for <freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Mon, 22 Feb 2016 15:41:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 376611A73
 for <freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 15:41:26 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from porto.starpoint.kiev.ua (porto-e.starpoint.kiev.ua
 [212.40.38.100])
 by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id RAA24975;
 Mon, 22 Feb 2016 17:41:24 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1])
 by porto.starpoint.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD))
 id 1aXsc0-0007Eh-JW; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 17:41:24 +0200
Subject: Re: unexpected package dependency
To: Perry Hutchison <perryh@pluto.rain.com>
References: <56c43d57.Pot24goK72QkTKqk%perryh@pluto.rain.com>
 <56C45B9C.7090808@FreeBSD.org>
 <56c6760d.nR7fjvuf3gEK3yNY%perryh@pluto.rain.com>
Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org
From: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org>
Message-ID: <56CB2BD4.1040908@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 17:40:04 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <56c6760d.nR7fjvuf3gEK3yNY%perryh@pluto.rain.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 15:41:28 -0000

On 19/02/2016 03:55, Perry Hutchison wrote:
> Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org> wrote:
>> On 17/02/2016 11:28, Perry Hutchison wrote:
>>> I had not expected to find gcc listed (in packagesite.yaml) as a
>>> dependency of the sysutils/cpuburn package.  I can understand a
>>> _port_ needing gcc (at build time), but does the cpuburn _package_
>>> actually require gcc at _runtime_?
>>
>> I don't believe so.  AFAIR, it builds static binaries.
> 
> So would the inclusion of gcc in the "deps" for sysutils/cpuburn (in
> packagesite.yaml) be caused by a problem with the way the dependencies
> are specified in the port, or with the way they are handled by the
> package-generation mechanism?  (I'm trying to figure out which to file
> a PR against -- and I'm not all that familiar with pkgng details.)
> 

My recollection is that the ports infrastructure does not allow to specify
whether a non-base compiler (like GCC for FreeBSD 11) is required only as a
compiler (that is, only during the build time) or if its run-time is required as
well.  The latter is always assumed.

But I could be mistaken.

-- 
Andriy Gapon