Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 17:06:20 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Miles Nordin <carton@Ivy.NET> Cc: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pthread_mutex_timedlock on sparc64 Message-ID: <20060420210620.GA29933@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <oqzmiggdw4.fsf@castrovalva.Ivy.NET> References: <001801c66372$a032e770$2522630a@t22> <20060419054116.GA39394@xor.obsecurity.org> <Pine.GSO.4.64.0604190835400.1870@sea.ntplx.net> <20060420074713.Y52948@hades.admin.frm2> <20060420182331.GA26174@xor.obsecurity.org> <oqk69khvsx.fsf@castrovalva.Ivy.NET> <20060420204114.GA29490@xor.obsecurity.org> <oq64l4ht5o.fsf@castrovalva.Ivy.NET> <20060420205340.GA29736@xor.obsecurity.org> <oqzmiggdw4.fsf@castrovalva.Ivy.NET>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--EeQfGwPcQSOJBaQU Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 05:01:31PM -0400, Miles Nordin wrote: > >>>>> "kk" =3D=3D Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> writes: >=20 > kk> libkse . . . M:N >=20 > k. >=20 > kk> libthr=20 >=20 > man page says this is 1:1, kernel threads like Linux or Solaris >=3D 9 >=20 > kk> libc_r >=20 > # man libc_r > No manual entry for libc_r > # man libc > No manual entry for libc > # man c_r > No manual entry for c_r >=20 > Is libc_r 1:N a.k.a. userland threads? Yes. In practise libthr is the fastest thread package, although there must still be some reason we don't make it the default. Kris --EeQfGwPcQSOJBaQU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFER/fLWry0BWjoQKURAlz0AJ9qm97DwvLcIlulSciJ1C7gqKUWOACfRVN6 hyifIGYpzuxzcQ6/OBvCUeQ= =TvWV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --EeQfGwPcQSOJBaQU--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060420210620.GA29933>