Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 15:28:34 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> To: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> Cc: svn-ports-head <svn-ports-head@freebsd.org>, Vsevolod Stakhov <vsevolod@FreeBSD.org>, "Timur I. Bakeyev" <timur@FreeBSD.org>, Steve Wills <swills@freebsd.org>, svn-ports-all <svn-ports-all@freebsd.org>, marino@freebsd.org, "ports-committers@freebsd.org" <ports-committers@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r361646 - in head/net/samba36: . files Message-ID: <20140716132834.GO48710@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> In-Reply-To: <20140716132619.GA46088@FreeBSD.org> References: <53C65677.8060603@FreeBSD.org> <20140716111328.GB82901@FreeBSD.org> <53C6638E.6000801@FreeBSD.org> <20140716115304.GA5861@FreeBSD.org> <53C668C9.9030209@FreeBSD.org> <20140716120705.GA14729@FreeBSD.org> <53C66C3B.1000905@FreeBSD.org> <20140716124326.GA26506@FreeBSD.org> <20140716124557.GM48710@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <20140716132619.GA46088@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--cmVHo2jXx4bdYlgS Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 01:26:19PM +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 02:45:57PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 12:43:26PM +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > > P.S. About that +MANIFEST file: can we please please please make it > > > human readable? Like, break the lines, use indentation, etc. Maybe = it > > > is more appropriate to keep +COMPACT_MANIFEST as one-liner, although I > > > am not convinced that separate +COMPACT_MANIFEST should exist at all. > >=20 > > If you want a human readable version uses the -R options from pkg > > info/search. The one inside the tar file is not made to be human > > readable :) >=20 > Does it mean that it was deliberate decision to make it unreadable? What > is the rationale for such move? IMHO unless the price is too high, things > should be kept readable (even inside tarballs, yes). it is just inlined and yes it was deliberate because of the size of the fil= e, on large ports that matters (even with the compression) regards, Bapt --cmVHo2jXx4bdYlgS Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAlPGfgIACgkQ8kTtMUmk6EwKZQCgs619Gw79FZSK9GoaYfbehYrp ftAAoIEMmW52aV5iBTzRU04Hri7XtUbE =ePnH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --cmVHo2jXx4bdYlgS--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140716132834.GO48710>