Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 16 Jun 2006 10:43:56 +0000
From:      "Wojciech A. Koszek" <dunstan@freebsd.czest.pl>
To:        Valentino Volonghi <dialtone@gmail.com>
Cc:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org, "Wojciech A. Koszek" <wkoszek@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: (Should be: MemTrace -- simple tool for tracking memory leaks)
Message-ID:  <20060616104356.GA85560@FreeBSD.czest.pl>
In-Reply-To: <c893b8530606141043g2f545544uea7a6effd2508c82@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <20060614010531.GA2033@FreeBSD.czest.pl> <20060613233117.GA60384@FreeBSD.czest.pl> <c893b8530606141043g2f545544uea7a6effd2508c82@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 07:43:06PM +0200, Valentino Volonghi wrote:
> On 6/14/06, Wojciech A. Koszek <wkoszek@freebsd.org> wrote:
> >On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 01:05:31AM +0000, Wojciech A. Koszek wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >
> >And yes, it's better to set a message subject before sending.
> 
[..]
> 
> static int memtrace_cache_misses;
> SYSCTL_INT(_vm_memtrace, OID_AUTO, misses, CTLFLAG_RD,
>    &memtrace_cache_misses, 0, "Number of misses to the MTrace cache");
> static int memtrace_cache_gced;
> SYSCTL_INT(_vm_memtrace, OID_AUTO, gced, CTLFLAG_RD,
>    &memtrace_cache_gced, 0, "Number of garbage collected entries");
> 
> everything else seems fine to me but I've _VERY_ little experience
> with FreeBSD internals and I'm just exploring it these days.

Yes, your analysis is correct. I'll either bring your version to the
source and deploy memtrace_cache_gced, or remove it at all.

Thanks,
-- 
Wojciech A. Koszek
wkoszek@FreeBSD.org
http://FreeBSD.czest.pl/dunstan/



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060616104356.GA85560>