From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 29 02:23:32 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2687E16A4DF for ; Thu, 29 Jun 2006 02:23:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@hub.org) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [200.46.204.220]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47D9344B1E for ; Thu, 29 Jun 2006 01:55:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@hub.org) Received: from localhost (wm.hub.org [200.46.204.128]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AED65290C6D; Wed, 28 Jun 2006 22:55:27 -0300 (ADT) Received: from hub.org ([200.46.204.220]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.128]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 25280-01; Thu, 29 Jun 2006 01:55:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ganymede.hub.org (blk-7-151-244.eastlink.ca [71.7.151.244]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F10E3290C6C; Wed, 28 Jun 2006 22:55:26 -0300 (ADT) Received: by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix, from userid 1027) id 79131486DB; Wed, 28 Jun 2006 22:55:36 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77FDF486BF; Wed, 28 Jun 2006 22:55:36 -0300 (ADT) Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 22:55:36 -0300 (ADT) From: User Freebsd To: Jonathan Noack In-Reply-To: <44A32939.8040104@alumni.rice.edu> Message-ID: <20060628225524.Q43909@ganymede.hub.org> References: <20060628211703.Y43909@ganymede.hub.org> <20060628211837.L43909@ganymede.hub.org> <44A32939.8040104@alumni.rice.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Expensive timeout? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 02:23:32 -0000 On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, Jonathan Noack wrote: > Please don't top-post... > > User Freebsd wrote: >> On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, User Freebsd wrote: >>> Just got this on the console of one of hte servers that has been causing >>> problems ... >>> >>> Expensive timeout(9) function: 0xc0520e18(0xc8b223a0) 0.296959250 s >>> >>> not a very informative error, and that is all that was there, nothing >>> before, nothing after ... >> >> Oh, wait, does this have something to do with the Deadlock options I just >> added to the kernel? > > Yes, if you look in /sys/kern/kern_timeout.c you'll note that the "Expensive > timeout(9) function" printf is inside an "#ifdef DIAGNOSTIC". 'k, but is this something that I should be concerned about, or just ignore? ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . scrappy@hub.org MSN . scrappy@hub.org Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664