Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 7 Jul 2004 15:38:22 +0200
From:      Brad Knowles <brad.knowles@skynet.be>
To:        Kirk Strauser <kirk@strauser.com>
Cc:        current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Rewrite cvsup & portupgrade in C
Message-ID:  <p06002049bd11acd7e913@[10.0.1.3]>
In-Reply-To: <200407070825.18046.kirk@strauser.com>
References:  <E1Bhd1M-000KEo-Nz@smp500.sitetronics.com> <20040707070012.GC38356@dragon.nuxi.com> <p06002039bd11631ca135@[10.0.1.3]> <200407070825.18046.kirk@strauser.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 8:25 AM -0500 2004-07-07, Kirk Strauser wrote:

>  You have to get it into binary first.  EZM3 is not available on many
>  non-FreeBSD, non-Intel platforms.  Although it's used *primarily* by the
>  FreeBSD project, it seems like there would be enough of a demand for such a
>  thing that other a portable version would be readily adopted by other
>  projects.

	Right, but does this prohibit the creation of binary-only cvsup 
packages which don't rely on the ezm3 stuff once it's built?  Then 
people could do a pkg_add for that binary package, and not have to 
build it from source....

-- 
Brad Knowles, <brad.knowles@skynet.be>

"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little
temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."

     -- Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790), reply of the Pennsylvania
     Assembly to the Governor, November 11, 1755

   SAGE member since 1995.  See <http://www.sage.org/>; for more info.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?p06002049bd11acd7e913>