2002/freebsd-hackers/20020310.freebsd-hackers
Messages: 345, old messages first
|
Last update: Mon Feb 13 14:17:15 2023
|
|
home | archive sorted by: subject | author | date | reverse date
1. Mar 3 Developer Re: Hello,developer,introduction on ADSL 2. Mar 3 Michael Lucas Re: crash partition 3. Mar 3 Bob Bishop Re: Multicast problem with sis interface? 4. Mar 3 Conrad Sabatier A few questions about a few includes 5. Mar 3 Ian Re: A few questions about a few includes 6. Mar 3 Erik Trulsson Re: A few questions about a few includes 7. Mar 3 Robert Watson December 2001, January 2002 Bi-Monthly FreeBSD Status Report 8. Mar 3 Brian T.Schellenberger Re: A few questions about a few includes 9. Mar 3 John Kozubik periodic firewire max-out question 10. Mar 3 Brian T.Schellenberger Re: A few questions about a few includes 11. Mar 3 Terry Lambert Re: A few questions about a few includes 12. Mar 3 Greg Black Re: A few questions about a few includes 13. Mar 3 Conrad Sabatier Re: A few questions about a few includes 14. Mar 4 zmzl@sh163.net 2002中国（上海）国际给排水水处理展览会 15. Mar 4 Harti Brandt Re: A few questions about a few includes 16. Mar 4 Alexey V. Neyman please review the manpage 17. Mar 4 Erik Trulsson Re: A few questions about a few includes 18. Mar 4 Brian T.Schellenberger Re: How to write code in FreeBSD 19. Mar 4 M. Warner Losh Re: A few questions about a few includes 20. Mar 4 Harti Brandt Re: A few questions about a few includes
21. Mar 4 Erik Trulsson Re: Re: A few questions about a few includes 22. Mar 4 Koroush Saraf Routing question, Routed using one interface (more info) 23. Mar 4 James Re: periodic firewire max-out question 24. Mar 4 Ian Re: A few questions about a few includes 25. Mar 4 Lowell Gilbert Re: A few questions about a few includes 26. Mar 4 Lowell Gilbert Re: A few questions about a few includes 27. Mar 4 Bruce M Simpson Intel 820 RNG 28. Mar 4 Miguel Mendez fish [continued] 29. Mar 4 Garrett Rooney Re: fish [continued] 30. Mar 4 Adrian Filipi-Martin Re: Intel 820 RNG 31. Mar 4 Mark Murray Re: Intel 820 RNG 32. Mar 4 Sam Leffler (at Usenix) Re: Intel 820 RNG 33. Mar 4 Peter Wemm Re: Intel 820 RNG 34. Mar 4 Terry Lambert Re: Intel 820 RNG 35. Mar 4 Charles Henrich Realtime video capture/divx encoding (brooktree) beta testers required 36. Mar 4 Anish Mistry Re: Realtime video capture/divx encoding (brooktree) beta testers required 37. Mar 4 John Kozubik Re: periodic firewire max-out question 38. Mar 4 Dinesh Nair Re: fish [continued] 39. Mar 4 =?iso-8859-1?Q?Max_David_K AW: httpd in malloc(): warning: recursive call (FreeBSD error??) 40. Mar 4 Jim Durham 3.3 to 4.5 remote upgrade possible?
41. Mar 4 Geoff Mohler 4.5-RELEASE upgrade..didnt?? 42. Mar 4 Steve O'Hara-Smith Re: Realtime video capture/divx encoding (brooktree) beta testers required 43. Mar 4 Patrick Thomas cannot get more than 32 PTYs in 4.4-RELEASE 44. Mar 5 Matthew D. Fuller Re: 3.3 to 4.5 remote upgrade possible? 45. Mar 5 Heiko Recktenwald Re: Realtime video capture/divx encoding (brooktree) beta testers required 46. Mar 5 Maxim Sobolev Extending loader(8) for loading kerels/modules split across several disks 47. Mar 5 Dr Guihua Li Invitation letter from the Organisation Committee of the First World Congress of Future Science and Culture 48. Mar 5 Paul Halliday Re: cannot get more than 32 PTYs in 4.4-RELEASE 49. Mar 5 Eugene L. Vorokov C vs C++ 50. Mar 5 ICA Canada Online Help! serious problem. 51. Mar 5 Makoto Matsushita Re: cannot get more than 32 PTYs in 4.4-RELEASE 52. Mar 5 David Malone Re: Help! serious problem. 53. Mar 5 Erik Trulsson Re: C vs C++ 54. Mar 5 Harti Brandt Re: C vs C++ 55. Mar 5 Kenneth Culver Re: 4.5-RELEASE upgrade..didnt?? 56. Mar 5 Leo Bicknell Re: cannot get more than 32 PTYs in 4.4-RELEASE 57. Mar 5 Kenneth Culver Re: C vs C++ 58. Mar 5 John Baldwin RE: Extending loader(8) for loading kerels/modules split across 59. Mar 5 Martin Ankerl Re: C vs C++ 60. Mar 5 Kenneth Mays Re: C vs C++
61. Mar 5 Geoff Mohler Re: 4.5-RELEASE upgrade..didnt?? 62. Mar 5 Kenneth Culver Re: C vs C++ 63. Mar 5 Steve B. Re: C vs C++ 64. Mar 5 Raymond Wiker Re: C vs C++ 65. Mar 5 Geoff Mohler Re: 4.5-RELEASE upgrade..didnt?? 66. Mar 5 Brian T.Schellenberger Re: C vs C++ 67. Mar 5 M. Warner Losh Re: C vs C++ 68. Mar 5 Byron Servies Re: C vs C++ 69. Mar 5 Maxim Sobolev Re: Extending loader(8) for loading kerels/modules split across 70. Mar 5 Andy Sporner Re: C vs C++ 71. Mar 5 Terry Lambert Re: C vs C++ 72. Mar 5 Terry Lambert Re: Help! serious problem. 73. Mar 5 Terry Lambert Re: C vs C++ 74. Mar 5 Michael Scheidell Re: Help! serious problem. 75. Mar 5 Terry Lambert Re: C vs C++ 76. Mar 5 Julian Elischer Re: Help! serious problem. 77. Mar 5 Mark Santcroos Re: RS232/V24 Driver 78. Mar 5 Kenneth Culver Re: C vs C++ 79. Mar 5 Kenneth Culver Re: 4.5-RELEASE upgrade..didnt?? 80. Mar 5 Kenneth Culver Re: C vs C++
81. Mar 5 Kenneth Culver Re: C vs C++ 82. Mar 5 Kenneth Culver Re: C vs C++ 83. Mar 5 Brian T.Schellenberger Re: C vs C++ 84. Mar 5 Kenneth Mays Re: C vs C++ 85. Mar 5 Greg Shenaut Re: Help! serious problem. 86. Mar 5 Adrian Filipi-Martin Re: Intel 820 RNG 87. Mar 5 Adrian Filipi-Martin Re: Intel 820 RNG 88. Mar 5 Garance A Drosihn Re: C vs C++ 89. Mar 5 Steve B. Re: C vs C++ 90. Mar 5 Giorgos Keramidas RFC: style(9) isn't explicit about booleans for testing. 91. Mar 5 Terry Lambert Re: C vs C++ 92. Mar 5 Terry Lambert Re: C vs C++ 93. Mar 5 Zhihui Zhang A weird disk behaviour 94. Mar 5 Julian Elischer Re: RFC: style(9) isn't explicit about booleans for testing. 95. Mar 5 Julian Elischer Re: A weird disk behaviour 96. Mar 5 Zhihui Zhang Re: A weird disk behaviour 97. Mar 5 Charles Henrich Re: Realtime video capture/divx encoding (brooktree) beta testers required 98. Mar 5 Kenneth Culver Re: C vs C++ 99. Mar 5 Brian T.Schellenberger Re: C vs C++ 100. Mar 5 Rogier R. Mulhuijzen Re: A weird disk behaviour
101. Mar 5 Erik Trulsson Re: C vs C++ 102. Mar 5 Zhihui Zhang Re: A weird disk behaviour 103. Mar 5 Dag-Erling Smorgrav Re: Four misc. questions related to jail usage 104. Mar 5 Patrick Thomas Re: cannot get more than 32 PTYs in 4.4-RELEASE 105. Mar 5 Lars Eggert Re: A weird disk behaviour 106. Mar 5 Zhihui Zhang Re: A weird disk behaviour 107. Mar 5 Lars Eggert Re: A weird disk behaviour 108. Mar 5 Zhihui Zhang Re: A weird disk behaviour 109. Mar 5 Giorgos Keramidas Re: C vs C++ 110. Mar 5 Giorgos Keramidas Re: C vs C++ 111. Mar 5 Lars Eggert Re: A weird disk behaviour 112. Mar 5 Rogier R. Mulhuijzen Re: A weird disk behaviour 113. Mar 5 Zhihui Zhang Re: A weird disk behaviour 114. Mar 5 Julian Elischer Re: A weird disk behaviour 115. Mar 5 Mark Murray Re: Intel 820 RNG 116. Mar 5 Giorgos Keramidas Re: RFC: style(9) isn't explicit about booleans for testing. 117. Mar 5 David O'Brien Re: RFC: style(9) isn't explicit about booleans for testing. 118. Mar 5 Giorgos Keramidas Re: RFC: style(9) isn't explicit about booleans for testing. 119. Mar 5 Nate Williams Re: C vs C++ 120. Mar 5 Zhihui Zhang Re: A weird disk behaviour
121. Mar 5 Kenneth Culver Re: C vs C++ 122. Mar 5 David O'Brien Re: Myson drivers for 4.x 123. Mar 5 David O'Brien Re: RFC: style(9) isn't explicit about booleans for testing. 124. Mar 5 Patrick Thomas Re: Four misc. questions related to jail usage 125. Mar 5 Brian F. Feldman Re: unionfs and getcwd problem. 126. Mar 5 Terry Lambert Re: C vs C++ 127. Mar 5 Brian T.Schellenberger Re: A weird disk behaviour 128. Mar 5 Terry Lambert Re: C vs C++ 129. Mar 5 Terry Lambert Re: C vs C++ 130. Mar 5 David Syphers Trout (was: C vs C++) 131. Mar 5 Kenneth Culver Re: C vs C++ 132. Mar 5 Brian T.Schellenberger Re: A weird disk behaviour 133. Mar 5 Brian T.Schellenberger Re: C vs C++ 134. Mar 5 David Xu please remove blank line 135. Mar 5 AHMAD MASOOD add me 136. Mar 5 David O'Brien Re: please remove blank line 137. Mar 5 Tony Arcieri aio_read() oddness 138. Mar 5 M. Warner Losh Re: RFC: style(9) isn't explicit about booleans for testing. 139. Mar 5 Mike Meyer Re: C vs C++ 140. Mar 5 Mike Meyer Re: RFC: style(9) isn't explicit about booleans for testing.
141. Mar 5 Poul-Henning Kamp Re: RFC: style(9) isn't explicit about booleans for testing. 142. Mar 5 Mike Meyer Re: RFC: style(9) isn't explicit about booleans for testing. 143. Mar 5 Poul-Henning Kamp Re: RFC: style(9) isn't explicit about booleans for testing. 144. Mar 6 Mike Meyer Re: RFC: style(9) isn't explicit about booleans for testing. 145. Mar 6 David O'Brien Re: RFC: style(9) isn't explicit about booleans for testing. 146. Mar 6 David O'Brien Re: RFC: style(9) isn't explicit about booleans for testing. 147. Mar 6 Poul-Henning Kamp Re: RFC: style(9) isn't explicit about booleans for testing. 148. Mar 6 Matthew Dillon patch for review, mountlist vnode scan generalization (vnlru() related) (current) 149. Mar 6 Peter J. Blok Re: aio_read() oddness 150. Mar 6 Mike Meyer Re: RFC: style(9) isn't explicit about booleans for testing. 151. Mar 6 Poul-Henning Kamp Re: RFC: style(9) isn't explicit about booleans for testing. 152. Mar 6 Mike Meyer Re: RFC: style(9) isn't explicit about booleans for testing. 153. Mar 6 Martin Blapp Sun idlc broken with our libc_r [Please help] 154. Mar 6 Vladimir B. " Grebenschiko Re: unionfs and getcwd problem. 155. Mar 6 Dag-Erling Smorgrav Re: Four misc. questions related to jail usage 156. Mar 6 D J Hawkey Jr Re: C vs C++ 157. Mar 6 Daniel Eischen Re: Sun idlc broken with our libc_r [Please help] 158. Mar 6 Martin Blapp Re: Sun idlc broken with our libc_r [Please help] 159. Mar 6 Rajesh P Jain BPF - Locally Generated Packet Reception 160. Mar 6 Rajesh P Jain (No Subject)
161. Mar 6 Daniel Eischen Re: Sun idlc broken with our libc_r [Please help] 162. Mar 6 Giorgos Keramidas Re: C vs C++ 163. Mar 6 Kip Macy Re: aio_read() oddness 164. Mar 6 Raymond Wiker Re: C vs C++ 165. Mar 6 Mark Murray Re: Intel 820 RNG 166. Mar 6 Conrad Sabatier kqueue example code - suggestions? 167. Mar 6 Kip Macy Re: kqueue example code - suggestions? 168. Mar 6 Martin Blapp Re: Sun idlc broken with our libc_r [Please help] 169. Mar 6 Zhihui Zhang Re: A weird disk behaviour 170. Mar 6 Maxim Konovalov Re: kqueue example code - suggestions? 171. Mar 6 Peter Edwards Re: A weird disk behaviour 172. Mar 6 Daniel Eischen Re: Sun idlc broken with our libc_r [Please help] 173. Mar 6 Greg Shenaut Re: RFC: style(9) isn't explicit about booleans for testing. 174. Mar 6 Paul C. Boyle I need hack, I would like a clock like the xdaliclock but reads the time out in HEX. 175. Mar 6 Peter Pentchev Re: A weird disk behaviour 176. Mar 6 Zhihui Zhang Re: A weird disk behaviour 177. Mar 6 Nate Williams Re: C vs C++ 178. Mar 6 Peter Pentchev Re: A weird disk behaviour 179. Mar 6 Paul C. Boyle I need hack, I would like a clock like the xdaliclock but reads the time out in HEX. 180. Mar 6 Ian Re: A weird disk behaviour
181. Mar 6 Martin Blapp Re: Sun idlc broken with our libc_r [Please help] 182. Mar 6 Zhihui Zhang Re: A weird disk behaviour 183. Mar 6 Zhihui Zhang Re: A weird disk behaviour 184. Mar 6 Martin Blapp Re: Sun idlc broken with our libc_r [Please help] 185. Mar 6 David O'Brien Re: RFC: style(9) isn't explicit about booleans for testing. 186. Mar 6 Garance A Drosihn Re: RFC: style(9) isn't explicit about booleans for testing. 187. Mar 6 Julian Elischer Re: please remove blank line 188. Mar 6 Daniel Eischen Re: Sun idlc broken with our libc_r [Please help] 189. Mar 6 Poul-Henning Kamp Re: RFC: style(9) isn't explicit about booleans for testing. 190. Mar 6 Julian Elischer Re: A weird disk behaviour 191. Mar 6 Martin Blapp Re: Sun idlc broken with our libc_r [Please help] 192. Mar 6 Daniel Eischen Re: Sun idlc broken with our libc_r [Please help] 193. Mar 6 Garance A Drosihn Re: RFC: style(9) isn't explicit about booleans for testing. 194. Mar 6 Tony Arcieri Re: aio_read() oddness 195. Mar 6 Kip Macy Re: aio_read() oddness 196. Mar 6 Ian Re: A weird disk behaviour 197. Mar 6 Joe Halpin Re: C vs C++ 198. Mar 6 Mike Meyer Re: I need hack, I would like a clock like the xdaliclock but reads the time out in HEX. 199. Mar 6 Andrew Re: kqueue example code - suggestions? 200. Mar 6 Kris Kennaway Re: Sun idlc broken with our libc_r [Please help]
201. Mar 6 Brian T.Schellenberger Re: A weird disk behaviour 202. Mar 6 Terry Lambert in_pcblookup_hash() called multiple times 203. Mar 6 Julian Elischer Re: in_pcblookup_hash() called multiple times 204. Mar 6 Sergey Babkin Re: C vs C++ 205. Mar 6 Hyong-Youb Kim netgear GA622T problem 206. Mar 6 Tony Finch Re: A few questions about a few includes 207. Mar 6 David O'Brien Re: C vs C++ 208. Mar 6 David O'Brien Re: RFC: style(9) isn't explicit about booleans for testing. 209. Mar 6 Diane Bruce Re: C vs C++ 210. Mar 6 Mike Meyer Re: C vs C++ 211. Mar 6 D J Hawkey Jr Re: C vs C++ 212. Mar 6 D J Hawkey Jr Re: C vs C++ 213. Mar 6 Tony Finch Re: RFC: style(9) isn't explicit about booleans for testing. 214. Mar 6 Terry Lambert Re: C vs C++ 215. Mar 6 Robert Watson Re: BPF - Locally Generated Packet Reception 216. Mar 6 Tony Finch Re: RFC: style(9) isn't explicit about booleans for testing. 217. Mar 6 Byron Servies Re: C vs C++ 218. Mar 6 Paul C. Boyle Re: I need hack, I would like a clock like the xdaliclock but reads the time out in HE 219. Mar 6 Mike Meyer Re: C vs C++ 220. Mar 6 admin@twwells.com Re: RFC: style(9) isn't explicit about booleans for testing.
221. Mar 6 Poul-Henning Kamp Re: RFC: style(9) isn't explicit about booleans for testing. 222. Mar 6 M. Warner Losh Re: RFC: style(9) isn't explicit about booleans for testing. 223. Mar 6 Poul-Henning Kamp Re: RFC: style(9) isn't explicit about booleans for testing. 224. Mar 6 Brian T.Schellenberger Re: I need hack, I would like a clock like the xdaliclock but reads the time out in HE 225. Mar 6 Koroush Saraf RouteD is limited - how can I? 226. Mar 6 David O'Brien Re: RFC: style(9) isn't explicit about booleans for testing. 227. Mar 6 Mark Santcroos Re: please remove blank line 228. Mar 7 Dimitar Peikov Swapping performance 229. Mar 7 Alfred Perlstein Re: Swapping performance 230. Mar 7 Miguel Mendez Re: C vs C++ 231. Mar 7 Konrad Heuer Re: Swapping performance 232. Mar 7 Michael Smith Re: Extending loader(8) for loading kerels/modules split across several disks 233. Mar 7 Alfred Perlstein Re: Swapping performance 234. Mar 7 Maxim Sobolev Re: Extending loader(8) for loading kerels/modules split across several disks 235. Mar 7 Bill Fumerola Re: in_pcblookup_hash() called multiple times 236. Mar 7 Brian T.Schellenberger Re: RFC: style(9) isn't explicit about booleans for testing -- an actual analysis of the code! 237. Mar 7 Michael Smith Re: Extending loader(8) for loading kerels/modules split across several disks 238. Mar 7 Jan Grant Re: C vs C++ 239. Mar 7 D J Hawkey Jr Re: C vs C++ 240. Mar 7 Valery N. Khromov Converting physical into virtual address
241. Mar 7 Julian Elischer Re: in_pcblookup_hash() called multiple times 242. Mar 7 Andy Sporner RE: Converting physical into virtual address 243. Mar 7 Maxim Sobolev Re: Extending loader(8) for loading kerels/modules split across several disks 244. Mar 7 Miguel Mendez Re: Converting physical into virtual address 245. Mar 7 Julian Elischer Re: Swapping performance 246. Mar 7 Andy Sporner Re: Converting physical into virtual address 247. Mar 7 Dimitar Peikov Re: Swapping performance 248. Mar 7 Jacques A. Vidrine Re: C vs C++ 249. Mar 7 GB Clark Re: Swapping performance 250. Mar 7 Adrian Filipi-Martin Re: Intel 820 RNG 251. Mar 7 Peter Pentchev Re: Swapping performance 252. Mar 7 Dimitar Peikov Re: Swapping performance 253. Mar 7 cjp Re: Swapping performance 254. Mar 7 Harti Brandt Re: Swapping performance 255. Mar 7 Dimitar Peikov <mitko@rila Re: Swapping performance 256. Mar 7 Erik Trulsson Re: Swapping performance 257. Mar 7 Erik Trulsson Re: Swapping performance 258. Mar 7 Simon 'corecode' Schubert Re: Swapping performance 259. Mar 7 Jan Grant Bug? still looking, yet to knock up small test case. Suggestions solicited. 260. Mar 7 Zhihui Zhang A question of VM page ownership
261. Mar 7 Alfred Perlstein Re: Bug? still looking, yet to knock up small test case. Suggestions solicited. 262. Mar 7 Alfred Perlstein Re: A question of VM page ownership 263. Mar 7 Jan Grant Re: Bug? still looking, yet to knock up small test case. Suggestions solicited. 264. Mar 7 Zhihui Zhang Re: A question of VM page ownership 265. Mar 7 Mike Silbersack Re: Swapping performance 266. Mar 7 Terry Lambert Re: Extending loader(8) for loading kerels/modules split across several disks 267. Mar 7 Tom Re: Swapping performance 268. Mar 7 Mike Silbersack Re: Swapping performance 269. Mar 7 Rogier R. Mulhuijzen Re: Swapping performance 270. Mar 7 Michael Smith Re: Extending loader(8) for loading kerels/modules split across several disks 271. Mar 7 Terry Lambert Re: in_pcblookup_hash() called multiple times 272. Mar 7 Mike Silbersack Re: Swapping performance 273. Mar 7 David O'Brien Re: Swapping performance 274. Mar 7 Michael Smith Re: Extending loader(8) for loading kerels/modules split across several disks 275. Mar 7 Terry Lambert Re: Swapping performance 276. Mar 7 David O'Brien Re: Swapping performance 277. Mar 7 Terry Lambert Re: A question of VM page ownership 278. Mar 7 Michael Smith Re: Converting physical into virtual address 279. Mar 7 Matthew Dillon Re: Swapping performance 280. Mar 7 Julian Elischer Re: A question of VM page ownership
281. Mar 7 Matthew Dillon Re: Swapping performance 282. Mar 7 Zhihui Zhang Re: A question of VM page ownership 283. Mar 7 Terry Lambert Re: Swapping performance 284. Mar 7 Matthew Dillon Re: A question of VM page ownership 285. Mar 7 Terry Lambert Re: Extending loader(8) for loading kerels/modules split across several disks 286. Mar 7 Matthew Dillon Re: Swapping performance 287. Mar 7 Simon 'corecode' Schubert Optimisation errors (Was: Swapping performance) 288. Mar 7 Terry Lambert Re: Swapping performance 289. Mar 7 Michael Smith Re: Extending loader(8) for loading kerels/modules split across several disks 290. Mar 7 Terry Lambert Re: Optimisation errors (Was: Swapping performance) 291. Mar 7 Terry Lambert Re: Extending loader(8) for loading kerels/modules split across several disks 292. Mar 7 Michael Smith Re: Extending loader(8) for loading kerels/modules split across several disks 293. Mar 7 Clark C . Evans Re: read-only root partition? 294. Mar 7 Garance A Drosihn Re: RFC: style(9) isn't explicit about booleans for testing -- an actual analysis of the code! 295. Mar 7 Leo Bicknell Re: RFC: style(9) isn't explicit about booleans for testing -- an actual analysis of the code! 296. Mar 7 David Greenman Re: Swapping performance 297. Mar 7 Mike Meyer Re: C vs C++ 298. Mar 7 Terry Lambert Re: Extending loader(8) for loading kerels/modules split across several disks 299. Mar 7 M. Warner Losh Re: Converting physical into virtual address 300. Mar 7 David Boggs Berkeley Packet Filter question
301. Mar 7 Brooks Davis Re: Berkeley Packet Filter question 302. Mar 7 Bill Fumerola Re: in_pcblookup_hash() called multiple times 303. Mar 7 Robert Watson Re: in_pcblookup_hash() called multiple times 304. Mar 7 Bill Fumerola Re: in_pcblookup_hash() called multiple times 305. Mar 7 Terry Lambert Re: in_pcblookup_hash() called multiple times 306. Mar 7 Terry Lambert Re: in_pcblookup_hash() called multiple times 307. Mar 7 Alfred Perlstein Re: in_pcblookup_hash() called multiple times 308. Mar 7 Dimitar Peikov Re: Swapping performance 309. Mar 7 Dimitar Peikov Re: Swapping performance 310. Mar 7 Mike Silbersack Re: in_pcblookup_hash() called multiple times 311. Mar 7 Dimitar Peikov <mitko@rila Re: Swapping performance 312. Mar 7 Dimitar Peikov Re: Swapping performance 313. Mar 7 Alfred Perlstein Re: in_pcblookup_hash() called multiple times 314. Mar 7 Mike Silbersack Re: in_pcblookup_hash() called multiple times 315. Mar 8 Daniel O'Connor Remote GDB in -stable.. 316. Mar 8 David Xu Re: Swapping performance 317. Mar 8 Willem van Engen Re: Remote GDB in -stable.. 318. Mar 8 Terry Lambert Re: in_pcblookup_hash() called multiple times 319. Mar 8 Terry Lambert Re: Swapping performance 320. Mar 8 Rajesh P Jain Re: BPF - Locally Generated Packet Reception
321. Mar 8 Robert Watson Re: in_pcblookup_hash() called multiple times 322. Mar 8 Michael Stevens bug in Time::Local (can't handle 1901) 323. Mar 8 Mike Silbersack Re: Swapping performance 324. Mar 8 Crist J. Clark Re: bug in Time::Local (can't handle 1901) 325. Mar 8 Julian Elischer Where are the TCP patches for 4.4? 326. Mar 8 Will Andrews Re: Where are the TCP patches for 4.4? 327. Mar 8 Kenneth Culver Re: Where are the TCP patches for 4.4? 328. Mar 8 Julian Elischer Re: Where are the TCP patches for 4.4? 329. Mar 8 D J Hawkey Jr Re: Where are the TCP patches for 4.4? 330. Mar 8 Garance A Drosihn Re: Where are the TCP patches for 4.4? 331. Mar 8 Nicolas Rachinsky bug in libutil or ppp? 332. Mar 8 Julian Elischer Re: Where are the TCP patches for 4.4? 333. Mar 8 Julian Elischer Re: Where are the TCP patches for 4.4? 334. Mar 8 Daniel O'Connor Re: Where are the TCP patches for 4.4? 335. Mar 8 Daniel O'Connor Re: Remote GDB in -stable.. 336. Mar 8 Dima Dorfman Re: bin/34744: Add -a (same as -PpR) flag to cp(1) 337. Mar 9 David O'Brien Re: bin/34744: Add -a (same as -PpR) flag to cp(1) 338. Mar 9 Willem van Engen Re: Remote GDB in -stable.. 339. Mar 9 Peter Kieser Problems with Network after compile of latest 4.5-STABLE 340. Mar 9 Michael Scheidell Re: Problems with Network after compile of latest 4.5-STABLE
341. Mar 9 Luigi Rizzo Re: Problems with Network after compile of latest 4.5-STABLE 342. Mar 9 Peter Kieser Re: Problems with Network after compile of latest 4.5-STABLE 343. Mar 9 Mike Silbersack Re: Problems with Network after compile of latest 4.5-STABLE 344. Mar 9 Andrew L. Neporada [PATCH] exit status of mtree(1) 345. Mar 9 Peter Kieser Re: Problems with Network after compile of latest 4.5-STABLE
home | archive sorted by: subject | author | date | reverse date