2003/freebsd-standards/20031130.freebsd-standards
Messages: 21, old messages first
|
Last update: Mon Feb 13 14:23:03 2023
|
|
home | archive sorted by: subject | author | date | reverse date
1. Nov 24 FreeBSD bugmaster Current problem reports assigned to you 2. Nov 24 FreeBSD bugmaster Current problem reports assigned to you 3. Nov 25 David O'Brien Why is max groups set so low (16)? 4. Nov 25 Bruce Evans Re: Why is max groups set so low (16)? 5. Nov 28 Steve Kargl Implementing C99's roundf(), round(), and roundl() 6. Nov 28 Marcel Moolenaar 64-bit NULL: a followup 7. Nov 28 Erik Trulsson Re: 64-bit NULL: a followup 8. Nov 28 Marcel Moolenaar Re: 64-bit NULL: a followup 9. Nov 28 Bruce Evans Re: 64-bit NULL: a followup 10. Nov 28 Marcel Moolenaar Re: 64-bit NULL: a followup 11. Nov 28 M. Warner Losh Re: 64-bit NULL: a followup 12. Nov 29 David Schultz Re: Implementing C99's roundf(), round(), and roundl() 13. Nov 29 Marcel Moolenaar Re: 64-bit NULL: a followup 14. Nov 29 Harti Brandt Re: 64-bit NULL: a followup 15. Nov 29 Bruce Evans Re: 64-bit NULL: a followup 16. Nov 29 Steve Kargl Re: Implementing C99's roundf(), round(), and roundl() 17. Nov 29 Marcel Moolenaar Re: 64-bit NULL: a followup 18. Nov 29 Steven G. Kargl standards/59797: Implement C99's round[f]() math fucntions 19. Nov 29 Samy Al Bahra Re: Why is max groups set so low (16)? 20. Nov 29 Stefan Farfeleder Re: standards/59797: Implement C99's round[f]() math fucntions
21. Nov 29 Bruce Evans Re: Why is max groups set so low (16)?
home | archive sorted by: subject | author | date | reverse date