Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)


2004/freebsd-standards/20040307.freebsd-standards

Messages: 24, new messages first
Last update: Mon Feb 13 14:23:06 2023

home | archive sorted by: subject | author | date | reverse date
  1. Mar  6 Erik Trulsson              Re: where do %j/uintmax_t stand in terms of standards? [WAS: Re: WARNS cleanup for ipfw
  2. Mar  6 Johan Karlsson             where do %j/uintmax_t stand in terms of standards? [WAS: Re: WARNS cleanup for ipfw
  3. Mar  3 David Schultz              Re: Another conformance question...  This time fputs().
  4. Mar  3 Bruce Evans                Re: Another conformance question...  This time fputs().
  5. Mar  3 Jordan K. Hubbard          Re: Another conformance question...  This time fputs().
  6. Mar  3 David Schultz              Re: Another conformance question...  This time fputs().
  7. Mar  3 Bruce Evans                Re: Another conformance question...  This time fputs().
  8. Mar  3 Mark Valentine             Re: What's up with /usr/src/usr.bin/alias?
  9. Mar  3 Jordan K. Hubbard          Re: What's up with /usr/src/usr.bin/alias?
 10. Mar  3 Mark Valentine             Re: What's up with /usr/src/usr.bin/alias?
 11. Mar  2 Jordan K. Hubbard          What's up with /usr/src/usr.bin/alias?
 12. Mar  2 Jordan K. Hubbard          Re: Another conformance question...  This time fputs().
 13. Mar  2 Bruce Evans                Re: Another conformance question...  This time fputs().
 14. Mar  2 Poul-Henning Kamp          Re: standards/62858: malloc(0) not C99 compliant
 15. Mar  2 Stefan Farfeleder          Re: standards/62858: malloc(0) not C99 compliant
 16. Mar  2 Jordan K. Hubbard          Re: Another conformance question...  This time fputs().
 17. Mar  2 David Schultz              Re: Another conformance question...  This time fputs().
 18. Mar  1 FreeBSD bugmaster          Current problem reports assigned to you
 19. Mar  1 Poul-Henning Kamp          Re: standards/62858: malloc(0) not C99 compliant
 20. Mar  1 David Schultz              Re: standards/62858: malloc(0) not C99 compliant


21. Mar 1 Poul-Henning Kamp Re: standards/62858: malloc(0) not C99 compliant 22. Mar 1 Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q? Re: standards/62858: malloc(0) not C99 compliant 23. Feb 29 Mike Heffner Re: standards/61934: [PATCH] FreeBSD's mailx not completely SUSv3-compliant 24. Feb 29 Poul-Henning Kamp Re: standards/62858: malloc(0) not C99 compliant


home | archive sorted by: subject | author | date | reverse date