2006/freebsd-hackers/20061105.freebsd-hackers
Messages: 122, old messages first
|
Last update: Mon Feb 13 14:17:31 2023
|
|
home | archive sorted by: subject | author | date | reverse date
1. Oct 29 Garrett Cooper How to write a FreeBSD-style makefile : checking for external vars existence? 2. Oct 29 Daniel O'Connor Re: How to write a FreeBSD-style makefile : checking for external vars existence? 3. Oct 29 Yar Tikhiy File trees: the deeper, the weirder 4. Oct 29 Ulrich Spoerlein Re: File trees: the deeper, the weirder 5. Oct 29 David Malone Re: File trees: the deeper, the weirder 6. Oct 29 Matt Emmerton Re: File trees: the deeper, the weirder 7. Oct 29 freebsd@bitfreak.org Yeah, but what does it mean? [Was: Re: File trees: the deeper, the weirder] 8. Oct 29 Frank Mayhar Re: Yeah, but what does it mean? [Was: Re: File trees: the deeper, the weirder] 9. Oct 29 Romain Tartiere [patch] rm can have undesired side-effects 10. Oct 29 Joerg Pernfuss Re: [patch] rm can have undesired side-effects 11. Oct 29 Steven Hartland Re: [patch] rm can have undesired side-effects 12. Oct 30 Borja Marcos Re: [patch] rm can have undesired side-effects 13. Oct 30 Mike Meyer Re: [patch] rm can have undesired side-effects 14. Oct 30 Joerg Pernfuss Re: [patch] rm can have undesired side-effects 15. Oct 30 Daniel O'Connor Re: [patch] rm can have undesired side-effects 16. Oct 30 Joerg Pernfuss Re: [patch] rm can have undesired side-effects 17. Oct 30 perryh@pluto.rain.com Re: [patch] rm can have undesired side-effects 18. Oct 30 Joerg Pernfuss Re: [patch] rm can have undesired side-effects 19. Oct 30 Steven Hartland Re: [patch] rm can have undesired side-effects 20. Oct 30 Steven Hartland Re: [patch] rm can have undesired side-effects
21. Oct 30 Joerg Pernfuss Re: [patch] rm can have undesired side-effects 22. Oct 30 Steven Hartland Re: [patch] rm can have undesired side-effects 23. Oct 30 Mike Meyer Re: [patch] rm can have undesired side-effects 24. Oct 30 Steven Hartland Re: [patch] rm can have undesired side-effects 25. Oct 30 LI Xin Re: [patch] rm can have undesired side-effects 26. Oct 30 Eric Anderson Re: Yeah, but what does it mean? [Was: Re: File trees: the deeper, the weirder] 27. Oct 30 Dave Clausen Process arguments 28. Oct 30 Julian Elischer Re: Process arguments 29. Oct 30 Ganbold Re: Process arguments 30. Oct 30 Adrian Chadd Re: Process arguments 31. Oct 30 Yar Tikhiy Re: File trees: the deeper, the weirder 32. Oct 30 Peter Jeremy Re: [patch] rm can have undesired side-effects 33. Oct 30 Joerg Pernfuss Re: [patch] rm can have undesired side-effects 34. Oct 30 LI Xin Re: [patch] rm can have undesired side-effects 35. Oct 30 <soralx@cydem.org> Re: [patch] rm can have undesired side-effects 36. Oct 30 LI Xin Re: [patch] rm can have undesired side-effects 37. Oct 30 Peter Jeremy Re: [patch] rm can have undesired side-effects 38. Oct 30 Yar Tikhiy Re: File trees: the deeper, the weirder 39. Oct 30 LI Xin Re: [patch] rm can have undesired side-effects 40. Oct 30 Yar Tikhiy Re: File trees: the deeper, the weirder
41. Oct 30 Yar Tikhiy Re: File trees: the deeper, the weirder 42. Oct 30 Kostik Belousov Re: File trees: the deeper, the weirder 43. Oct 29 Sam Smith UKUUG SysAdmin Conference in Manchester UK in March 44. Oct 30 Geoff Mohler NFS attr cache performance 45. Oct 30 Robert Watson Re: Process arguments 46. Oct 30 Eric Anderson Re: NFS attr cache performance 47. Oct 30 Yar Tikhiy Re: File trees: the deeper, the weirder 48. Oct 30 Yan Obtaining used pages on process exit? 49. Oct 30 Peter Jeremy Re: [patch] rm can have undesired side-effects 50. Oct 30 Dave Clausen Re: Process arguments 51. Oct 30 Doug Barton Re: [patch] rm can have undesired side-effects 52. Oct 30 Bakul Shah Re: [patch] rm can have undesired side-effects 53. Oct 30 Doug Barton Re: [patch] rm can have undesired side-effects 54. Oct 30 Bakul Shah Re: [patch] rm can have undesired side-effects 55. Oct 30 Simon L. Nielsen Re: [patch] rm can have undesired side-effects 56. Oct 30 Tim Clewlow Re: [patch] rm can have undesired side-effects 57. Oct 30 Doug Barton Re: [patch] rm can have undesired side-effects 58. Oct 30 Mike Meyer Re: [patch] rm can have undesired side-effects 59. Oct 31 Freddie Cash Re: [patch] rm can have undesired side-effects 60. Oct 31 Doug Barton Re: [patch] rm can have undesired side-effects
61. Oct 30 Geoff Mohler Re: NFS attr cache performance 62. Oct 31 Mike Meyer Re: [patch] rm can have undesired side-effects 63. Oct 31 tech@nano.net Email recommendations 64. Oct 31 Jeff Mohler Re: Email recommendations 65. Oct 31 Freddie Cash Re: Email recommendations 66. Oct 31 Vasil Dimov Re: [patch] rm can have undesired side-effects 67. Oct 31 Michael Bushkov PIC questions 68. Oct 31 perryh@pluto.rain.com Re: [patch] rm can have undesired side-effects 69. Oct 31 tech@nano.net Re: Email recommendations 70. Oct 31 Kostik Belousov Re: PIC questions 71. Oct 31 Oliver Fromme Re: Obtaining used pages on process exit? 72. Oct 31 Daniel Valencia Re: [patch] rm can have undesired side-effects 73. Oct 31 Tim Clewlow Re: [patch] rm can have undesired side-effects 74. Oct 31 Bakul Shah Re: [patch] rm can have undesired side-effects 75. Oct 31 Tim Clewlow Re: [patch] rm can have undesired side-effects 76. Oct 31 Shane Compile Issue: "cannot find -ldl" 77. Oct 31 Brooks Davis Re: Compile Issue: "cannot find -ldl" 78. Oct 31 Josh Carroll sockstat tcp/udp switches 79. Nov 1 <soralx@cydem.org> Re: [patch] rm can have undesired side-effects 80. Nov 2 Mohacsi Janos Re: sockstat tcp/udp switches
81. Nov 2 Julian Stacey NFS on 6.1 limits at 4 Gig 82. Nov 2 Jan Grant Re: [patch] rm can have undesired side-effects 83. Nov 2 Maxim A. Zhuravlev [call for comments] l2sched 84. Nov 2 John Baldwin Re: NFS on 6.1 limits at 4 Gig 85. Nov 2 Daniel Eischen Re: [call for comments] l2sched 86. Nov 2 Maxim A. Zhuravlev Re: [call for comments] l2sched 87. Nov 2 Coleman Kane Re: [call for comments] l2sched 88. Nov 2 Maxim A. Zhuravlev Re: [call for comments] l2sched 89. Nov 2 Coleman Kane Re: [call for comments] l2sched 90. Nov 2 Julian H. Stacey Re: NFS on 6.1 limits at 4 Gig 91. Nov 2 Anthony Chavez Panic on 6.1-RELEASE-p3 92. Nov 2 tech@nano.net Java 93. Nov 2 Mike Meyer Re: Java 94. Nov 2 Brooks Davis Re: Java 95. Nov 2 tech@nano.net Re: Java 96. Nov 2 John Baldwin Re: NFS on 6.1 limits at 4 Gig 97. Nov 2 Mario Lobo Re: Java 98. Nov 2 John Baldwin Re: Panic on 6.1-RELEASE-p3 99. Nov 2 Josh Carroll Re: sockstat tcp/udp switches 100. Nov 2 Devon H. O'Dell vr(4) performance
101. Nov 2 Sam Leffler Re: vr(4) performance 102. Nov 3 Pyun YongHyeon Re: vr(4) performance 103. Nov 3 Giorgos Keramidas Re: sockstat tcp/udp switches 104. Nov 3 tech@nano.net Re: Java 105. Nov 3 Josh Carroll Re: sockstat tcp/udp switches 106. Nov 3 Giorgos Keramidas Re: sockstat tcp/udp switches 107. Nov 3 Brooks Davis Re: sockstat tcp/udp switches 108. Nov 3 Giorgos Keramidas Re: sockstat tcp/udp switches 109. Nov 3 Craig Boston Re: [patch] rm can have undesired side-effects 110. Nov 3 Joerg Sonnenberger Re: vr(4) performance 111. Nov 3 Joerg Sonnenberger Re: vr(4) performance 112. Nov 3 Peter Jeremy Re: Java 113. Nov 3 Greg Lewis Re: Java 114. Nov 3 Garance A Drosehn Re: [patch] rm can have undesired side-effects 115. Nov 3 Anthony Chavez Re: Panic on 6.1-RELEASE-p3 116. Nov 3 Josh Carroll Re: sockstat tcp/udp switches 117. Nov 4 Peter Jeremy Re: sockstat tcp/udp switches 118. Nov 4 Andrey V. Elsukov Yet another magic symlinks implementation 119. Nov 4 Divacky Roman Re: Yet another magic symlinks implementation 120. Nov 4 Kostik Belousov Re: Yet another magic symlinks implementation
121. Nov 4 Sam Leffler Re: vr(4) performance 122. Nov 4 Mike Meyer Re: Yet another magic symlinks implementation
home | archive sorted by: subject | author | date | reverse date