Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)


2006/freebsd-hackers/20061105.freebsd-hackers

Messages: 122, new messages first
Last update: Mon Feb 13 14:17:31 2023

home | archive sorted by: subject | author | date | reverse date
  1. Nov  4 Mike Meyer                 Re: Yet another magic symlinks implementation
  2. Nov  4 Sam Leffler                Re: vr(4) performance
  3. Nov  4 Kostik Belousov            Re: Yet another magic symlinks implementation
  4. Nov  4 Divacky Roman              Re: Yet another magic symlinks implementation
  5. Nov  4 Andrey V. Elsukov          Yet another magic symlinks implementation
  6. Nov  4 Peter Jeremy               Re: sockstat tcp/udp switches
  7. Nov  3 Josh Carroll               Re: sockstat tcp/udp switches
  8. Nov  3 Anthony Chavez             Re: Panic on 6.1-RELEASE-p3
  9. Nov  3 Garance A Drosehn          Re: [patch] rm can have undesired side-effects
 10. Nov  3 Greg Lewis                 Re: Java
 11. Nov  3 Peter Jeremy               Re: Java
 12. Nov  3 Joerg Sonnenberger         Re: vr(4) performance
 13. Nov  3 Joerg Sonnenberger         Re: vr(4) performance
 14. Nov  3 Craig Boston               Re: [patch] rm can have undesired side-effects
 15. Nov  3 Giorgos Keramidas          Re: sockstat tcp/udp switches
 16. Nov  3 Brooks Davis               Re: sockstat tcp/udp switches
 17. Nov  3 Giorgos Keramidas          Re: sockstat tcp/udp switches
 18. Nov  3 Josh Carroll               Re: sockstat tcp/udp switches
 19. Nov  3 tech@nano.net              Re: Java
 20. Nov  3 Giorgos Keramidas          Re: sockstat tcp/udp switches


21. Nov 3 Pyun YongHyeon Re: vr(4) performance 22. Nov 2 Sam Leffler Re: vr(4) performance 23. Nov 2 Devon H. O'Dell vr(4) performance 24. Nov 2 Josh Carroll Re: sockstat tcp/udp switches 25. Nov 2 John Baldwin Re: Panic on 6.1-RELEASE-p3 26. Nov 2 Mario Lobo Re: Java 27. Nov 2 John Baldwin Re: NFS on 6.1 limits at 4 Gig 28. Nov 2 tech@nano.net Re: Java 29. Nov 2 Brooks Davis Re: Java 30. Nov 2 Mike Meyer Re: Java 31. Nov 2 tech@nano.net Java 32. Nov 2 Anthony Chavez Panic on 6.1-RELEASE-p3 33. Nov 2 Julian H. Stacey Re: NFS on 6.1 limits at 4 Gig 34. Nov 2 Coleman Kane Re: [call for comments] l2sched 35. Nov 2 Maxim A. Zhuravlev Re: [call for comments] l2sched 36. Nov 2 Coleman Kane Re: [call for comments] l2sched 37. Nov 2 Maxim A. Zhuravlev Re: [call for comments] l2sched 38. Nov 2 Daniel Eischen Re: [call for comments] l2sched 39. Nov 2 John Baldwin Re: NFS on 6.1 limits at 4 Gig 40. Nov 2 Maxim A. Zhuravlev [call for comments] l2sched
41. Nov 2 Jan Grant Re: [patch] rm can have undesired side-effects 42. Nov 2 Julian Stacey NFS on 6.1 limits at 4 Gig 43. Nov 2 Mohacsi Janos Re: sockstat tcp/udp switches 44. Nov 1 <soralx@cydem.org> Re: [patch] rm can have undesired side-effects 45. Oct 31 Josh Carroll sockstat tcp/udp switches 46. Oct 31 Brooks Davis Re: Compile Issue: "cannot find -ldl" 47. Oct 31 Shane Compile Issue: "cannot find -ldl" 48. Oct 31 Tim Clewlow Re: [patch] rm can have undesired side-effects 49. Oct 31 Bakul Shah Re: [patch] rm can have undesired side-effects 50. Oct 31 Tim Clewlow Re: [patch] rm can have undesired side-effects 51. Oct 31 Daniel Valencia Re: [patch] rm can have undesired side-effects 52. Oct 31 Oliver Fromme Re: Obtaining used pages on process exit? 53. Oct 31 Kostik Belousov Re: PIC questions 54. Oct 31 tech@nano.net Re: Email recommendations 55. Oct 31 perryh@pluto.rain.com Re: [patch] rm can have undesired side-effects 56. Oct 31 Michael Bushkov PIC questions 57. Oct 31 Vasil Dimov Re: [patch] rm can have undesired side-effects 58. Oct 31 Freddie Cash Re: Email recommendations 59. Oct 31 Jeff Mohler Re: Email recommendations 60. Oct 31 tech@nano.net Email recommendations
61. Oct 31 Mike Meyer Re: [patch] rm can have undesired side-effects 62. Oct 30 Geoff Mohler Re: NFS attr cache performance 63. Oct 31 Doug Barton Re: [patch] rm can have undesired side-effects 64. Oct 31 Freddie Cash Re: [patch] rm can have undesired side-effects 65. Oct 30 Mike Meyer Re: [patch] rm can have undesired side-effects 66. Oct 30 Doug Barton Re: [patch] rm can have undesired side-effects 67. Oct 30 Tim Clewlow Re: [patch] rm can have undesired side-effects 68. Oct 30 Simon L. Nielsen Re: [patch] rm can have undesired side-effects 69. Oct 30 Bakul Shah Re: [patch] rm can have undesired side-effects 70. Oct 30 Doug Barton Re: [patch] rm can have undesired side-effects 71. Oct 30 Bakul Shah Re: [patch] rm can have undesired side-effects 72. Oct 30 Doug Barton Re: [patch] rm can have undesired side-effects 73. Oct 30 Dave Clausen Re: Process arguments 74. Oct 30 Peter Jeremy Re: [patch] rm can have undesired side-effects 75. Oct 30 Yan Obtaining used pages on process exit? 76. Oct 30 Yar Tikhiy Re: File trees: the deeper, the weirder 77. Oct 30 Eric Anderson Re: NFS attr cache performance 78. Oct 30 Robert Watson Re: Process arguments 79. Oct 30 Geoff Mohler NFS attr cache performance 80. Oct 29 Sam Smith UKUUG SysAdmin Conference in Manchester UK in March
81. Oct 30 Kostik Belousov Re: File trees: the deeper, the weirder 82. Oct 30 Yar Tikhiy Re: File trees: the deeper, the weirder 83. Oct 30 Yar Tikhiy Re: File trees: the deeper, the weirder 84. Oct 30 LI Xin Re: [patch] rm can have undesired side-effects 85. Oct 30 Yar Tikhiy Re: File trees: the deeper, the weirder 86. Oct 30 Peter Jeremy Re: [patch] rm can have undesired side-effects 87. Oct 30 LI Xin Re: [patch] rm can have undesired side-effects 88. Oct 30 <soralx@cydem.org> Re: [patch] rm can have undesired side-effects 89. Oct 30 LI Xin Re: [patch] rm can have undesired side-effects 90. Oct 30 Joerg Pernfuss Re: [patch] rm can have undesired side-effects 91. Oct 30 Peter Jeremy Re: [patch] rm can have undesired side-effects 92. Oct 30 Yar Tikhiy Re: File trees: the deeper, the weirder 93. Oct 30 Adrian Chadd Re: Process arguments 94. Oct 30 Ganbold Re: Process arguments 95. Oct 30 Julian Elischer Re: Process arguments 96. Oct 30 Dave Clausen Process arguments 97. Oct 30 Eric Anderson Re: Yeah, but what does it mean? [Was: Re: File trees: the deeper, the weirder] 98. Oct 30 LI Xin Re: [patch] rm can have undesired side-effects 99. Oct 30 Steven Hartland Re: [patch] rm can have undesired side-effects 100. Oct 30 Mike Meyer Re: [patch] rm can have undesired side-effects
101. Oct 30 Steven Hartland Re: [patch] rm can have undesired side-effects 102. Oct 30 Joerg Pernfuss Re: [patch] rm can have undesired side-effects 103. Oct 30 Steven Hartland Re: [patch] rm can have undesired side-effects 104. Oct 30 Steven Hartland Re: [patch] rm can have undesired side-effects 105. Oct 30 Joerg Pernfuss Re: [patch] rm can have undesired side-effects 106. Oct 30 perryh@pluto.rain.com Re: [patch] rm can have undesired side-effects 107. Oct 30 Joerg Pernfuss Re: [patch] rm can have undesired side-effects 108. Oct 30 Daniel O'Connor Re: [patch] rm can have undesired side-effects 109. Oct 30 Joerg Pernfuss Re: [patch] rm can have undesired side-effects 110. Oct 30 Mike Meyer Re: [patch] rm can have undesired side-effects 111. Oct 30 Borja Marcos Re: [patch] rm can have undesired side-effects 112. Oct 29 Steven Hartland Re: [patch] rm can have undesired side-effects 113. Oct 29 Joerg Pernfuss Re: [patch] rm can have undesired side-effects 114. Oct 29 Romain Tartiere [patch] rm can have undesired side-effects 115. Oct 29 Frank Mayhar Re: Yeah, but what does it mean? [Was: Re: File trees: the deeper, the weirder] 116. Oct 29 freebsd@bitfreak.org Yeah, but what does it mean? [Was: Re: File trees: the deeper, the weirder] 117. Oct 29 Matt Emmerton Re: File trees: the deeper, the weirder 118. Oct 29 David Malone Re: File trees: the deeper, the weirder 119. Oct 29 Ulrich Spoerlein Re: File trees: the deeper, the weirder 120. Oct 29 Yar Tikhiy File trees: the deeper, the weirder
121. Oct 29 Daniel O'Connor Re: How to write a FreeBSD-style makefile : checking for external vars existence? 122. Oct 29 Garrett Cooper How to write a FreeBSD-style makefile : checking for external vars existence?


home | archive sorted by: subject | author | date | reverse date