2013/freebsd-net/20130505.freebsd-net
Messages: 57, old messages first
Last update: Mon Feb 13 14:18:51 2023
|
|
home | archive sorted by: subject | author | date | reverse date
1. Apr 28 Barney Cordoba Re: High CPU interrupt load on intel I350T4 with igb on 8.3 2. Apr 28 =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Olivier_Coc Re: forwarding/ipfw/pf evolution (in pps) on -current 3. Apr 28 Sami Halabi Re: using netmap 4. Apr 28 Jack Vogel Re: High CPU interrupt load on intel I350T4 with igb on 8.3 5. Apr 28 Barney Cordoba Re: High CPU interrupt load on intel I350T4 with igb on 8.3 6. Apr 28 Mark Johnston Re: TF_NEEDSYN flag never set. 7. Apr 28 Juli Mallett Re: TF_NEEDSYN flag never set. 8. Apr 29 Barry Spinney RE: TF_NEEDSYN flag never set. 9. Apr 29 Gleb Smirnoff Re: pf performance? 10. Apr 29 Spacedart SpaceDart.com Offers Pay Per Click Campaign! 11. Apr 29 Eugene Grosbein lagg+vlan+igb kernel bug 12. Apr 29 FreeBSD bugmaster Current problem reports assigned to freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org 13. Apr 29 Eugene Grosbein Re: lagg+vlan+igb kernel bug 14. Apr 30 Juan Mojica in_lltable_rtcheck 15. Apr 30 Li, Qing RE: in_lltable_rtcheck 16. Apr 30 Nate Denning Re: kern/178116: [tcp] [panic] Kernel panic: general protection fault in tcp_do_segment 17. Apr 30 Juan Mojica Re: in_lltable_rtcheck 18. Apr 30 wind@sourcearmory.com Capture packets before kernel process 19. May 1 Kevin Oberman Re: Capture packets before kernel process 20. May 1 Juli Mallett Re: Capture packets before kernel process
21. May 1 wind@sourcearmory.com Re: Capture packets before kernel process 22. May 1 Gleb Smirnoff Re: kern/178116: [tcp] [panic] Kernel panic: general protection fault in tcp_do_segment 23. May 1 Nate Denning Re: kern/178116: [tcp] [panic] Kernel panic: general protection fault in tcp_do_segment 24. May 1 Gleb Smirnoff Re: kern/178116: [tcp] [panic] Kernel panic: general protection fault in tcp_do_segment 25. May 1 Nate Denning Re: kern/178116: [tcp] [panic] Kernel panic: general protection fault in tcp_do_segment 26. May 1 Barney Cordoba Re: Capture packets before kernel process 27. May 2 Richard Sharpe Seeing EINVAL from writev on 8.0 to a non-blocking socket even though the data seems to hit the wire 28. May 2 Julian Elischer Re: Capture packets before kernel process 29. May 2 Alfred Perlstein Re: Seeing EINVAL from writev on 8.0 to a non-blocking socket even though the data seems to hit the wire 30. May 2 Richard Sharpe Re: Seeing EINVAL from writev on 8.0 to a non-blocking socket even though the data seems to hit the wire 31. May 2 jabbaarbarelly (via Twitte jabbaarbarelly sent you an invitation 32. May 2 Juan Mojica Re: in_lltable_rtcheck 33. May 2 Eric van Gyzen Re: Seeing EINVAL from writev on 8.0 to a non-blocking socket even though the data seems to hit the wire 34. May 2 Richard Sharpe Re: Seeing EINVAL from writev on 8.0 to a non-blocking socket even though the data seems to hit the wire 35. May 3 Richard Sharpe Re: Seeing EINVAL from writev on 8.0 to a non-blocking socket even though the data seems to hit the wire 36. May 3 Eitan Adler Re: Seeing EINVAL from writev on 8.0 to a non-blocking socket even though the data seems to hit the wire 37. May 3 Eitan Adler Re: Seeing EINVAL from writev on 8.0 to a non-blocking socket even though the data seems to hit the wire 38. May 3 Aris Angelo Calculation of inflight data 39. May 3 Eric van Gyzen Re: Seeing EINVAL from writev on 8.0 to a non-blocking socket even though the data seems to hit the wire 40. May 3 Richard Sharpe Re: Seeing EINVAL from writev on 8.0 to a non-blocking socket even though the data seems to hit the wire
41. May 3 Daniel Feenberg Restarting exports disturbs clients 42. May 4 Richard Sharpe Re: Seeing EINVAL from writev on 8.0 to a non-blocking socket even though the data seems to hit the wire 43. May 4 Andre Oppermann Re: Calculation of inflight data 44. May 4 Jason Hellenthal IGMP with no matching rules 45. May 4 CAD Americas CAD Americas Early Bird Registration Ends May 7 46. May 4 Richard Sharpe Is there any way to limit the amount of data in an mbuf chain submitted to a driver? 47. May 4 Adrian Chadd Re: Is there any way to limit the amount of data in an mbuf chain submitted to a driver? 48. May 4 Adrian Chadd Re: Is there any way to limit the amount of data in an mbuf chain submitted to a driver? 49. May 4 Richard Sharpe Re: Is there any way to limit the amount of data in an mbuf chain submitted to a driver? 50. May 4 Jack Vogel Re: Is there any way to limit the amount of data in an mbuf chain submitted to a driver? 51. May 4 Jack Vogel Re: Is there any way to limit the amount of data in an mbuf chain submitted to a driver? 52. May 4 Richard Sharpe Re: Is there any way to limit the amount of data in an mbuf chain submitted to a driver? 53. May 4 Andre Oppermann Re: Is there any way to limit the amount of data in an mbuf chain submitted to a driver? 54. May 4 Jack Vogel Re: Is there any way to limit the amount of data in an mbuf chain submitted to a driver? 55. May 4 Jack Vogel Re: Is there any way to limit the amount of data in an mbuf chain submitted to a driver? 56. May 4 Richard Sharpe Re: Is there any way to limit the amount of data in an mbuf chain submitted to a driver? 57. May 4 linimon@FreeBSD.org Re: kern/178288: [fxp] fxp network driver broken in 7.4
home | archive sorted by: subject | author | date | reverse date