2017/freebsd-ports/20170625.freebsd-ports
Messages: 126, old messages first
|
Last update: Mon Feb 13 14:22:30 2023
|
|
home | archive sorted by: subject | author | date | reverse date
1. Jun 18 Ben Lavery-Griffiths Keeping -CURRENT up to date with Poudriere 2. Jun 18 Steve Kargl [PATCH] lang/python27 -- Fix namespace collision 3. Jun 18 Steve Kargl Re: [PATCH] lang/python27 -- Fix namespace collision 4. Jun 18 Ultima Re: Keeping -CURRENT up to date with Poudriere 5. Jun 18 Ultima Re: Keeping -CURRENT up to date with Poudriere 6. Jun 19 Thomas Mueller pkg convert? 7. Jun 19 Global Test Market How much Is Your Opinion Worth? 8. Jun 19 Jeff Sickel FreeBSD Port: MailScanner-5.0.3 9. Jun 19 Matthew Seaman Re: pkg convert? 10. Jun 19 wen heping Re: FreeBSD Port: MailScanner-5.0.3 11. Jun 19 DutchDaemon - FreeBSD Foru Re: FreeBSD Port: MailScanner-5.0.3 12. Jun 19 Xavi Garcia databases/mariadb101-client broken in the quarterly branch (libressl) 13. Jun 19 Borodin Oleg Re: Questions about order of adding application to freebsd ports. 14. Jun 19 Xavi Garcia Re: databases/mariadb101-client broken in the quarterly branch (libressl) 15. Jun 19 Ben Lavery-Griffiths Re: Keeping -CURRENT up to date with Poudriere 16. Jun 19 Kurt Jaeger Re: Questions about order of adding application to freebsd ports. 17. Jun 19 The Doctor Apache 2.4.26 18. Jun 19 Jaap Akkerhuis Re: Keeping -CURRENT up to date with Poudriere 19. Jun 19 Matt Smith Re: Keeping -CURRENT up to date with Poudriere 20. Jun 20 Thomas Mueller Re: pkg convert?
21. Jun 20 Jov Re: Keeping -CURRENT up to date with Poudriere 22. Jun 20 Kubilay Kocak Re: [PATCH] lang/python27 -- Fix namespace collision 23. Jun 20 Steve Kargl Re: [PATCH] lang/python27 -- Fix namespace collision 24. Jun 20 Jeffrey Bouquet perl problem 25. Jun 21 Andrea Venturoli net-mgmt/nagios-check_ports and jails 26. Jun 21 Carmel NY Update Postfix-current port. 27. Jun 21 Ryan Frederick Re: net-mgmt/nagios-check_ports and jails 28. Jun 21 Yuri Please commit the new port science/py-pymol: OpenGL based molecular visualization system 29. Jun 21 Ryan Frederick Re: net-mgmt/nagios-check_ports and jails 30. Jun 21 Kurt Jaeger Re: Update Postfix-current port. 31. Jun 21 Kurt Jaeger Re: Update Postfix-current port. 32. Jun 22 Andrea Venturoli Re: net-mgmt/nagios-check_ports and jails 33. Jun 22 portscout@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date 34. Jun 22 David Demelier [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 35. Jun 22 Baptiste Daroussin Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 36. Jun 22 =?UTF-8?Q?Fernando_Apesteg Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 37. Jun 22 Baptiste Daroussin Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 38. Jun 22 Vlad K. Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 39. Jun 22 David Demelier Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 40. Jun 22 The Doctor NEW APR/APR-Utils
41. Jun 22 <scratch65535@att.net> Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 42. Jun 22 Baptiste Daroussin Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 43. Jun 22 David Demelier Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 44. Jun 22 Matthew Seaman Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 45. Jun 22 =?UTF-8?Q?Fernando_Apesteg PR needs care 46. Jun 22 Baho Utot Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 47. Jun 22 Torsten Zuehlsdorff Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 48. Jun 22 <scratch65535@att.net> Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 49. Jun 22 Julian Elischer Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 50. Jun 22 Baho Utot Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 51. Jun 22 Torsten Zuehlsdorff Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 52. Jun 22 Julian Elischer Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 53. Jun 22 <scratch65535@att.net> Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 54. Jun 22 Matthew Seaman Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 55. Jun 22 <scratch65535@att.net> Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 56. Jun 22 <scratch65535@att.net> Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 57. Jun 22 Rastko P Thunderbird + Lightning on FreeBSD 58. Jun 22 Dave Hayes Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 59. Jun 22 Dave Hayes Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 60. Jun 22 demelier.david@gmail.com Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version
61. Jun 22 Dave Hayes Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 62. Jun 22 Andre Goree Re: NEW APR/APR-Utils 63. Jun 22 Mark Linimon Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 64. Jun 22 <scratch65535@att.net> Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 65. Jun 22 Miroslav Lachman Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 66. Jun 22 Baho Utot Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 67. Jun 22 Grzegorz Junka Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 68. Jun 23 Grzegorz Junka Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 69. Jun 23 George Mitchell www/libxul 70. Jun 23 Dewayne Geraghty Re: NEW APR/APR-Utils 71. Jun 23 Baho Utot Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 72. Jun 23 Kurt Jaeger Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 73. Jun 23 The Doctor Re: NEW APR/APR-Utils 74. Jun 23 Julian Elischer Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 75. Jun 23 Julian Elischer Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 76. Jun 23 Julian Elischer Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 77. Jun 23 Julian Elischer Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 78. Jun 23 Dewayne Geraghty Re: NEW APR/APR-Utils 79. Jun 23 Mark Linimon Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 80. Jun 23 Jan Beich Re: www/libxul
81. Jun 23 Julian Elischer Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 82. Jun 23 Kurt Jaeger Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 83. Jun 23 Julian Elischer Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 84. Jun 23 Mark Linimon Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 85. Jun 23 Mark Linimon Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 86. Jun 23 demelier.david@gmail.com Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 87. Jun 23 demelier.david@gmail.com Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 88. Jun 23 Vlad K. Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 89. Jun 23 demelier.david@gmail.com Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 90. Jun 23 Guido Falsi Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 91. Jun 23 abi [SAMBA] and file content caching 92. Jun 23 Matthew Seaman Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 93. Jun 23 demelier.david@gmail.com Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 94. Jun 23 Vlad K. Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 95. Jun 23 Yasuhiro KIMURA PR commit request 96. Jun 23 RW Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 97. Jun 23 The Doctor Re: NEW APR/APR-Utils 98. Jun 23 <scratch65535@att.net> Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 99. Jun 23 Baho Utot Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 100. Jun 23 Matt Smith Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version
101. Jun 23 Baho Utot Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 102. Jun 23 Mark Linimon Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 103. Jun 23 George Mitchell Re: www/libxul 104. Jun 23 Guido Falsi Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 105. Jun 23 Guido Falsi Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 106. Jun 23 Baho Utot Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 107. Jun 23 Grzegorz Junka Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 108. Jun 23 Julian Elischer Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 109. Jun 23 Julian Elischer Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 110. Jun 23 Grzegorz Junka Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 111. Jun 23 Grzegorz Junka Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 112. Jun 23 Michelle Sullivan Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 113. Jun 23 Vlad K. Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 114. Jun 23 Michelle Sullivan Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 115. Jun 24 =?utf-8?Q?Martin_Waschb=C3 Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 116. Jun 24 Thomas Mueller Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 117. Jun 24 Peter Jeremy security/libressl not API-compatible with OpenSSL, breaks www/apache24 118. Jun 24 Grzegorz Junka Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 119. Jun 24 Bruno Haible GNU libffcall 1.13 is released 120. Jun 24 Jov Re: GNU libffcall 1.13 is released
121. Jun 24 Adam Weinberger Re: security/libressl not API-compatible with OpenSSL, breaks www/apache24 122. Jun 24 Walter Schwarzenfeld Re: security/libressl not API-compatible with OpenSSL, breaks www/apache24 123. Jun 24 Carmel NY clamav-unofficial-sigs 124. Jun 24 Bob Eager Easytag crashes with SIGABRT - stack overflow 125. Jun 24 Steven Hartland Re: Easytag crashes with SIGABRT - stack overflow 126. Jun 24 Bob Eager Re: Easytag crashes with SIGABRT - stack overflow
home | archive sorted by: subject | author | date | reverse date