2021/freebsd-current/20211107.freebsd-current
Messages: 26, old messages first
|
Last update: Mon Feb 13 14:17:23 2023
|
|
home | archive sorted by: subject | author | date | reverse date
1. Nov 1 Steve Kargl Re: access to ld128 system 2. Nov 1 Yuri Re: Deprecating smbfs(5) and removing it before FreeBSD 14 3. Nov 1 Miroslav Lachman Re: Deprecating smbfs(5) and removing it before FreeBSD 14 4. Nov 1 Rick Macklem Re: Deprecating smbfs(5) and removing it before FreeBSD 14 5. Nov 1 Ed Maste Re: Deprecating smbfs(5) and removing it before FreeBSD 14 6. Nov 1 Warner Losh Re: Deprecating smbfs(5) and removing it before FreeBSD 14 7. Nov 1 Miroslav Lachman Re: Deprecating smbfs(5) and removing it before FreeBSD 14 8. Nov 2 Michael Butler via freebsd current now panics when starting VBox VM 9. Nov 2 Greg V via freebsd-current Re: current now panics when starting VBox VM 10. Nov 2 Hans Petter Selasky Re: current now panics when starting VBox VM 11. Nov 2 Cy Schubert Re: current now panics when starting VBox VM 12. Nov 2 Michael Butler via freebsd Re: current now panics when starting VBox VM 13. Nov 3 Ed Maste Re: current now panics when starting VBox VM 14. Nov 3 Michael Butler via freebsd Re: current now panics when starting VBox VM 15. Nov 3 Konstantin Belousov Re: current now panics when starting VBox VM 16. Nov 3 Michael Butler via freebsd Re: current now panics when starting VBox VM 17. Nov 5 Steve Kargl [LIBM] One step closer to C99 conformance 18. Nov 5 obiwac Potential bug in the dynamic linker? 19. Nov 5 Ed Maste Re: [LIBM] One step closer to C99 conformance 20. Nov 5 obiwac Potential bug in the dynamic linker?
21. Nov 5 Steve Kargl Re: [LIBM] One step closer to C99 conformance 22. Nov 5 Steve Kargl WHY? commit ac76bc1145dd7f4476e5d982ce8f355f71015713 23. Nov 5 Dimitry Andric Re: WHY? commit ac76bc1145dd7f4476e5d982ce8f355f71015713 24. Nov 5 Steve Kargl Re: WHY? commit ac76bc1145dd7f4476e5d982ce8f355f71015713 25. Nov 5 Steve Kargl Re: WHY? commit ac76bc1145dd7f4476e5d982ce8f355f71015713 26. Nov 6 Konstantin Belousov Re: Potential bug in the dynamic linker?
home | archive sorted by: subject | author | date | reverse date