Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)


2024/freebsd-net/20240304.freebsd-net

Messages: 35, new messages first
Last update: Mon Mar 4 0:07:04 2024

home | archive sorted by: subject | author | date | reverse date
  1. Mar  3 =?UTF-8?B?R3nDtnJneSBQw6Fz ix driver vlanhwfilter issue - how to catch a lion
  2. Mar  3 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 218579] bge(4): Wake on Lan (WoL) does not work
  3. Mar  3 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 218579] bge(4): Wake on Lan (WoL) does not work
  4. Mar  3 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 277435] [Feature request] Add an option to destroy the tap/tun interface when the descriptor is closed
  5. Mar  3 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 277435] [Feature request] Add an option to destroy the tap/tun interface when the descriptor is closed
  6. Mar  3 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 275774] IPv4 Mapper address problem
  7. Mar  3 bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.o Problem reports for net@FreeBSD.org that need special attention
  8. Mar  3 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 277435] [Feature request] Add an option to destroy the tap/tun interface when the descriptor is closed
  9. Mar  3 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 277435] [Feature request] Add an option to destroy the tap/tun interface when the descriptor is closed
 10. Mar  3 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 277435] [Feature request] Add an option to destroy the tap/tun interface when the descriptor is closed
 11. Mar  3 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 277435] [Feature request] Add an option to destroy the tap/tun interface when the descriptor is closed
 12. Mar  3 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 277435] [Feature request] Add an option to destroy the tap/tun interface when the descriptor is closed
 13. Mar  3 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 277435] [Feature request] Add an option to destroy the tap/tun interface when the descriptor is closed
 14. Mar  3 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 277435] [Feature request] Add an option to destroy the tap/tun interface when the descriptor is closed
 15. Mar  3 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 277435] [Feature request] Add an option to destroy the tap/tun interface when the descriptor is closed
 16. Mar  3 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 218579] bge(4): Wake on Lan (WoL) does not work
 17. Mar  3 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 218579] bge(4): Wake on Lan (WoL) does not work
 18. Mar  3 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 218579] bge(4): Wake on Lan (WoL) does not work
 19. Mar  3 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 218579] bge(4): Wake on Lan (WoL) does not work
 20. Mar  3 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 277435] [Feature request] Add an option to destroy the tap/tun interface when the descriptor is closed


21. Mar 3 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 218579] bge(4): Wake on Lan (WoL) does not work 22. Mar 1 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 277396] CARP packet not processed 23. Mar 1 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 277349] The net.inet.ip.source_address_validation should ignore CARP IP in backup state 24. Feb 29 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 277349] The net.inet.ip.source_address_validation should ignore CARP IP in backup state 25. Feb 29 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 277349] The net.inet.ip.source_address_validation should ignore CARP IP in backup state 26. Feb 28 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 277349] The net.inet.ip.source_address_validation should ignore CARP IP in backup state 27. Feb 28 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 277349] The net.inet.ip.source_address_validation should ignore CARP IP in backup state 28. Feb 28 Hannes Hauswedell Re: NFS performance with 10GBase-T 29. Feb 28 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 276674] [panic] [htcp] sysctl net.inet.tcp.cc.algorithm=htcp produces kernel panic 30. Feb 27 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 277349] The net.inet.ip.source_address_validation should ignore CARP IP in backup state 31. Feb 27 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 276674] [panic] [htcp] sysctl net.inet.tcp.cc.algorithm=htcp produces kernel panic 32. Feb 26 Alex Shalima X710 stalled TX Queue and loss of networking 33. Feb 26 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 268151] BCM5720: attaching PHYs failed 34. Feb 26 Rick Macklem Re: NFS performance with 10GBase-T 35. Feb 26 Mark Saad Re: NFS performance with 10GBase-T


home | archive sorted by: subject | author | date | reverse date