Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)


2024/freebsd-toolchain/20240212.freebsd-toolchain

Messages: 34, old messages first
Last update: Mon Feb 12 0:07:01 2024

home | archive sorted by: subject | author | date | reverse date
  1. Feb  6 Mark Millard               Why does Mk/Uses/compiler.mk have code for "# clang not always supported on Tier-2" these days?
  2. Feb  6 Mark Millard               Why does devel/llvm18 not exclude FLANG for armv6? ( devel/llvm17 does exclude FLANG for armv6 )
  3. Feb  6 Mark Millard               devel/llvm18 on amd64: phase: package "Unable to access file . . ./stage/usr/local/llvm18/lib/clang/18/include/arm_sme.h" more
  4. Feb  6 Brooks Davis               Re: Why does devel/llvm18 not exclude FLANG for armv6? ( devel/llvm17 does exclude FLANG for armv6 )
  5. Feb  6 Brooks Davis               Re: Why does Mk/Uses/compiler.mk have code for "# clang not always supported on Tier-2" these days?
  6. Feb  6 Mark Millard               Re: Why does devel/llvm18 not exclude FLANG for armv6? ( devel/llvm17 does exclude FLANG for armv6 )
  7. Feb  6 Brooks Davis               Re: devel/llvm18 on amd64: phase: package "Unable to access file . . ./stage/usr/local/llvm18/lib/clang/18/include/arm_sme.h" more
  8. Feb  6 Mark Millard               For devel/llvm18 context: Bad llvm18 *.so file names? Bad references to llvm18 *.so file names? libLLVM-18.so vs. libLLVM-18rc.so ?
  9. Feb  6 Mark Millard               Re: devel/llvm18 on amd64: phase: package "Unable to access file . . ./stage/usr/local/llvm18/lib/clang/18/include/arm_sme.h" more
 10. Feb  6 Mark Millard               Re: For devel/llvm18 context: Bad llvm18 *.so file names? Bad references to llvm18 *.so file names? libLLVM-18.so vs. libLLVM-18rc.so ?
 11. Feb  7 Mark Millard               Re: For devel/llvm18 context: Bad llvm18 *.so file names? Bad references to llvm18 *.so file names? libLLVM-18.so vs. libLLVM-18rc.so ?
 12. Feb  7 Brooks Davis               Re: For devel/llvm18 context: Bad llvm18 *.so file names? Bad references to llvm18 *.so file names? libLLVM-18.so vs. libLLVM-18rc.so ?
 13. Feb  7 Mark Millard               Mk/Uses/llvm.mk is going to need _LLVM_MK_VALID_VERSIONS to also list 18
 14. Feb  7 Mark Millard               Re: For devel/llvm18 context: Bad llvm18 *.so file names? Bad references to llvm18 *.so file names? libLLVM-18.so vs. libLLVM-18rc.so ?
 15. Feb  8 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 276632] LLVM std::filesystem::remove_all fails to handle dangling symlinks
 16. Feb  8 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 264408] clang-14 crashes on the port graphics/dcmtk on aarch64
 17. Feb  8 Mark Millard               Why lang/gcc14-devel builds are failing on the build servers: needs USES= compiler:c++14-lang (or higher) instead of compiler:c++11-lang
 18. Feb  8 Mark Millard               lang/gcc* and MULTILIB: arm64 (aarch64) is never set up, even for main
 19. Feb  8 Nuno Teixeira              Re: Why lang/gcc14-devel builds are failing on the build servers: needs USES= compiler:c++14-lang (or higher) instead of compiler:c++11-lang
 20. Feb  8 Dimitry Andric             Re: Why lang/gcc14-devel builds are failing on the build servers: needs USES= compiler:c++14-lang (or higher) instead of compiler:c++11-lang


21. Feb 8 Nuno Teixeira Re: Why lang/gcc14-devel builds are failing on the build servers: needs USES= compiler:c++14-lang (or higher) instead of compiler:c++11-lang 22. Feb 8 Nuno Teixeira Re: Why lang/gcc14-devel builds are failing on the build servers: needs USES= compiler:c++14-lang (or higher) instead of compiler:c++11-lang 23. Feb 8 Mark Millard Re: Why lang/gcc14-devel builds are failing on the build servers: needs USES= compiler:c++14-lang (or higher) instead of compiler:c++11-lang 24. Feb 8 Brooks Davis Re: For devel/llvm18 context: Bad llvm18 *.so file names? Bad references to llvm18 *.so file names? libLLVM-18.so vs. libLLVM-18rc.so ? 25. Feb 9 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 276738] clang: static_assert conflicts with -std=c++98 -pedantic-errors 26. Feb 9 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 276703] clang crashes on the port www/ladybird on 15 (CURRENT) on amd64: Assertion failed: (!LHS.get()->hasPlaceholderType() && ! 27. Feb 9 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 276703] clang crashes on the port www/ladybird on 15 (CURRENT) on amd64: Assertion failed: (!LHS.get()->hasPlaceholderType() && ! 28. Feb 9 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 276703] clang crashes on the port www/ladybird on 15 (CURRENT) on amd64: Assertion failed: (!LHS.get()->hasPlaceholderType() && ! 29. Feb 9 Paul Floyd debuginfo changes 30. Feb 9 Gerald Pfeifer Re: lang/gcc* and MULTILIB: arm64 (aarch64) is never set up, even for main 31. Feb 9 Mark Millard Re: lang/gcc* and MULTILIB: arm64 (aarch64) is never set up, even for main 32. Feb 9 Konstantin Belousov Re: lang/gcc* and MULTILIB: arm64 (aarch64) is never set up, even for main 33. Feb 10 Paul Floyd Re: debuginfo changes 34. Feb 11 bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.o Problem reports for toolchain@FreeBSD.org that need special attention


home | archive sorted by: subject | author | date | reverse date