2024/freebsd-toolchain/20240212.freebsd-toolchain
Messages: 34, new messages first
|
Last update: Mon Feb 12 0:07:01 2024
|
|
home | archive sorted by: subject | author | date | reverse date
1. Feb 11 bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.o Problem reports for toolchain@FreeBSD.org that need special attention 2. Feb 10 Paul Floyd Re: debuginfo changes 3. Feb 9 Konstantin Belousov Re: lang/gcc* and MULTILIB: arm64 (aarch64) is never set up, even for main 4. Feb 9 Mark Millard Re: lang/gcc* and MULTILIB: arm64 (aarch64) is never set up, even for main 5. Feb 9 Gerald Pfeifer Re: lang/gcc* and MULTILIB: arm64 (aarch64) is never set up, even for main 6. Feb 9 Paul Floyd debuginfo changes 7. Feb 9 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 276703] clang crashes on the port www/ladybird on 15 (CURRENT) on amd64: Assertion failed: (!LHS.get()->hasPlaceholderType() && ! 8. Feb 9 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 276703] clang crashes on the port www/ladybird on 15 (CURRENT) on amd64: Assertion failed: (!LHS.get()->hasPlaceholderType() && ! 9. Feb 9 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 276703] clang crashes on the port www/ladybird on 15 (CURRENT) on amd64: Assertion failed: (!LHS.get()->hasPlaceholderType() && ! 10. Feb 9 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 276738] clang: static_assert conflicts with -std=c++98 -pedantic-errors 11. Feb 8 Brooks Davis Re: For devel/llvm18 context: Bad llvm18 *.so file names? Bad references to llvm18 *.so file names? libLLVM-18.so vs. libLLVM-18rc.so ? 12. Feb 8 Mark Millard Re: Why lang/gcc14-devel builds are failing on the build servers: needs USES= compiler:c++14-lang (or higher) instead of compiler:c++11-lang 13. Feb 8 Nuno Teixeira Re: Why lang/gcc14-devel builds are failing on the build servers: needs USES= compiler:c++14-lang (or higher) instead of compiler:c++11-lang 14. Feb 8 Nuno Teixeira Re: Why lang/gcc14-devel builds are failing on the build servers: needs USES= compiler:c++14-lang (or higher) instead of compiler:c++11-lang 15. Feb 8 Dimitry Andric Re: Why lang/gcc14-devel builds are failing on the build servers: needs USES= compiler:c++14-lang (or higher) instead of compiler:c++11-lang 16. Feb 8 Nuno Teixeira Re: Why lang/gcc14-devel builds are failing on the build servers: needs USES= compiler:c++14-lang (or higher) instead of compiler:c++11-lang 17. Feb 8 Mark Millard lang/gcc* and MULTILIB: arm64 (aarch64) is never set up, even for main 18. Feb 8 Mark Millard Why lang/gcc14-devel builds are failing on the build servers: needs USES= compiler:c++14-lang (or higher) instead of compiler:c++11-lang 19. Feb 8 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 264408] clang-14 crashes on the port graphics/dcmtk on aarch64 20. Feb 8 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 276632] LLVM std::filesystem::remove_all fails to handle dangling symlinks
21. Feb 7 Mark Millard Re: For devel/llvm18 context: Bad llvm18 *.so file names? Bad references to llvm18 *.so file names? libLLVM-18.so vs. libLLVM-18rc.so ? 22. Feb 7 Mark Millard Mk/Uses/llvm.mk is going to need _LLVM_MK_VALID_VERSIONS to also list 18 23. Feb 7 Brooks Davis Re: For devel/llvm18 context: Bad llvm18 *.so file names? Bad references to llvm18 *.so file names? libLLVM-18.so vs. libLLVM-18rc.so ? 24. Feb 7 Mark Millard Re: For devel/llvm18 context: Bad llvm18 *.so file names? Bad references to llvm18 *.so file names? libLLVM-18.so vs. libLLVM-18rc.so ? 25. Feb 6 Mark Millard Re: For devel/llvm18 context: Bad llvm18 *.so file names? Bad references to llvm18 *.so file names? libLLVM-18.so vs. libLLVM-18rc.so ? 26. Feb 6 Mark Millard Re: devel/llvm18 on amd64: phase: package "Unable to access file . . ./stage/usr/local/llvm18/lib/clang/18/include/arm_sme.h" more 27. Feb 6 Mark Millard For devel/llvm18 context: Bad llvm18 *.so file names? Bad references to llvm18 *.so file names? libLLVM-18.so vs. libLLVM-18rc.so ? 28. Feb 6 Brooks Davis Re: devel/llvm18 on amd64: phase: package "Unable to access file . . ./stage/usr/local/llvm18/lib/clang/18/include/arm_sme.h" more 29. Feb 6 Mark Millard Re: Why does devel/llvm18 not exclude FLANG for armv6? ( devel/llvm17 does exclude FLANG for armv6 ) 30. Feb 6 Brooks Davis Re: Why does Mk/Uses/compiler.mk have code for "# clang not always supported on Tier-2" these days? 31. Feb 6 Brooks Davis Re: Why does devel/llvm18 not exclude FLANG for armv6? ( devel/llvm17 does exclude FLANG for armv6 ) 32. Feb 6 Mark Millard devel/llvm18 on amd64: phase: package "Unable to access file . . ./stage/usr/local/llvm18/lib/clang/18/include/arm_sme.h" more 33. Feb 6 Mark Millard Why does devel/llvm18 not exclude FLANG for armv6? ( devel/llvm17 does exclude FLANG for armv6 ) 34. Feb 6 Mark Millard Why does Mk/Uses/compiler.mk have code for "# clang not always supported on Tier-2" these days?
home | archive sorted by: subject | author | date | reverse date