Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)


2020/freebsd-net/20201025.freebsd-net

Messages: 66, sorted by author
Last update: Mon Feb 13 14:19:09 2023
home | archive sorted by: subject | author | date | reverse date 
  1. Oct 21 =?UTF-8?Q?Goran_Meki=C4=87 Re: Help with VNET
  2. Oct 20 =?UTF-8?Q?Mi=C5=82osz_Kani safe_pause_us() is always at least 1 millisecond long
  3. Oct 22 Alexander V. Chernikov     Re: Panic in in6_joingroup_locked
  4. Oct 22 Alexander V. Chernikov      Re: Panic in in6_joingroup_locked
  5. Oct 21 Andrea Venturoli           Help with VNET
  6. Oct 21 Andrea Venturoli            Re: Help with VNET
  7. Oct 21 Andrea Venturoli            Re: Help with VNET
  8. Oct 22 Bjoern A. Zeeb             Re: Panic in in6_joingroup_locked
  9. Oct 24 Dewayne Geraghty           Re: Allow PING(8) in jails without raw socket access permissions
 10. Oct 21 Dheeraj Kandula            Re: ims_merge in in_mcast.c
 11. Oct 21 Kristof Provost            Re: Help with VNET
 12. Oct 21 Kristof Provost             Re: Help with VNET
 13. Oct 21 Patrick M. Hausen           Re: Help with VNET
 14. Oct 23 Paul Thornton              Getting netgraph stats
 15. Oct 21 Ryan Stone                 Panic in in6_joingroup_locked
 16. Oct 21 Ryan Stone                 Re: safe_pause_us() is always at least 1 millisecond long
 17. Oct 19 Shamsher Singh (sardarsi)  Re: Query for KNI and user level tcp/ip stack support in FreeBSD ports
 18. Oct 18 bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.o Problem reports for net@FreeBSD.org that need special attention
 19. Oct 23 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 125845] [tcp] [patch] tcp_lro_rx() should make use of hardware IP cksum assistance when available
 20. Oct 23 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o  [Bug 125845] [tcp] [patch] tcp_lro_rx() should make use of hardware IP cksum assistance when available



 21. Oct 23 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o  [Bug 125845] [tcp] [patch] tcp_lro_rx() should make use of hardware IP cksum assistance when available
 22. Oct 24 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 211106] [net][fib][loopback][route] loopback route added only to interface fib, even if net.add_addr_allfibs = 1
 23. Oct 24 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o  [Bug 211106] [net][fib][loopback][route] loopback route added only to interface fib, even if net.add_addr_allfibs = 1
 24. Oct 23 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 214558] [tcp] Improve descriptions for sysctl net.inet.tcp.keepinit
 25. Oct 23 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 217214] [tcp] frequent panics in tcp_output/sbsndptr
 26. Oct 23 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 219991] [tcp][PATCH] TCP process bogus packets with too large ACK
 27. Oct 22 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 224218] [sctp] Kernel panic in SCTP/IpV6 server mode
 28. Oct 23 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 234444] [tcp] cc_htcp + TCP_RFC7413 panic
 29. Oct 23 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 237720] [tcp] tcpip network stack seized for six hours after large high-throughput file transfer
 30. Oct 23 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 238741] [tcp] RACK stack causes connections to hang
 31. Oct 23 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 240416] [tcp] Windows scaling (net.inet.tcp.rfc1323=1) does not start the TCP connection to some systems
 32. Oct 23 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 240946] [tcp] Check for ipv6_zoneid in tcp_hc_lookup() alongside inc6_faddr
 33. Oct 23 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 242492] [tcp] TCP fast open observability
 34. Oct 18 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 248652] iflib: netmap pkt-gen large TX performance difference between 11-STABLE and 12-STABLE/CURRENT on ix & ixl NIC
 35. Oct 18 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o  [Bug 248652] iflib: netmap pkt-gen large TX performance difference between 11-STABLE and 12-STABLE/CURRENT on ix & ixl NIC
 36. Oct 18 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o  [Bug 248652] iflib: netmap pkt-gen large TX performance difference between 11-STABLE and 12-STABLE/CURRENT on ix & ixl NIC
 37. Oct 18 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o  [Bug 248652] iflib: netmap pkt-gen large TX performance difference between 11-STABLE and 12-STABLE/CURRENT on ix & ixl NIC
 38. Oct 18 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o  [Bug 248652] iflib: netmap pkt-gen large TX performance difference between 11-STABLE and 12-STABLE/CURRENT on ix & ixl NIC
 39. Oct 19 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o  [Bug 248652] iflib: netmap pkt-gen large TX performance difference between 11-STABLE and 12-STABLE/CURRENT on ix & ixl NIC
 40. Oct 19 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o  [Bug 248652] iflib: netmap pkt-gen large TX performance difference between 11-STABLE and 12-STABLE/CURRENT on ix & ixl NIC



 41. Oct 20 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o  [Bug 248652] iflib: netmap pkt-gen large TX performance difference between 11-STABLE and 12-STABLE/CURRENT on ix & ixl NIC
 42. Oct 20 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o  [Bug 248652] iflib: netmap pkt-gen large TX performance difference between 11-STABLE and 12-STABLE/CURRENT on ix & ixl NIC
 43. Oct 20 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o  [Bug 248652] iflib: netmap pkt-gen large TX performance difference between 11-STABLE and 12-STABLE/CURRENT on ix & ixl NIC
 44. Oct 20 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o  [Bug 248652] iflib: netmap pkt-gen large TX performance difference between 11-STABLE and 12-STABLE/CURRENT on ix & ixl NIC
 45. Oct 21 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o  [Bug 248652] iflib: netmap pkt-gen large TX performance difference between 11-STABLE and 12-STABLE/CURRENT on ix & ixl NIC
 46. Oct 21 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o  [Bug 248652] iflib: netmap pkt-gen large TX performance difference between 11-STABLE and 12-STABLE/CURRENT on ix & ixl NIC
 47. Oct 21 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o  [Bug 248652] iflib: netmap pkt-gen large TX performance difference between 11-STABLE and 12-STABLE/CURRENT on ix & ixl NIC
 48. Oct 22 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o  [Bug 248652] iflib: netmap pkt-gen large TX performance difference between 11-STABLE and 12-STABLE/CURRENT on ix & ixl NIC
 49. Oct 23 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o  [Bug 248652] iflib: netmap pkt-gen large TX performance difference between 11-STABLE and 12-STABLE/CURRENT on ix & ixl NIC
 50. Oct 18 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 250357] [tcp] RFC 5961 is not implemented completely
 51. Oct 18 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o  [Bug 250357] [tcp] RFC 5961 is not implemented completely
 52. Oct 18 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o  [Bug 250357] [tcp] RFC 5961 is not implemented completely
 53. Oct 18 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 250360] [tcp] connections should be closed if a same packet without FIN is received after FIN received
 54. Oct 18 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o  [Bug 250360] [tcp] connections should be closed if a same packet without FIN is received after FIN received
 55. Oct 18 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 250363] [tcp] data in syn_ack should be ignored
 56. Oct 18 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o  [Bug 250363] [tcp] data in syn_ack should be ignored
 57. Oct 20 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 250366] [tcp] The ioctl of socket fd should return -1 after listen to avoid misusing.
 58. Oct 21 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o  [Bug 250366] [tcp] The ioctl of socket fd should return -1 after listen to avoid misusing.
 59. Oct 21 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o  [Bug 250366] [tcp] The ioctl of socket fd should return -1 after listen to avoid misusing.
 60. Oct 18 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 250436] Regression in 12.stable em driver



 61. Oct 21 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 250499] [tcp] Should we reject the packet with timestamp if no timestamp in SYN and SYN_ACK?
 62. Oct 21 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o  [Bug 250499] [tcp] Should we reject the packet with timestamp if no timestamp in SYN and SYN_ACK?
 63. Oct 23 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o  [Bug 250499] [tcp] Should we reject the packet with timestamp if no timestamp in SYN and SYN_ACK?
 64. Oct 23 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 250552] [net] [fib] dangling route table entry after destroying interface
 65. Oct 24 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o  [Bug 250552] [net] [fib] dangling route table entry after destroying interface
 66. Oct 23 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 61744] [tcp] [patch] TCP hangs onto mbufs with no tcp data unnecessily under certain error conditions

home | archive sorted by: subject | author | date | reverse date