2012/freebsd-ports/20121014.freebsd-ports
Messages: 133, old messages first
|
Last update: Mon Feb 13 14:21:48 2023
|
|
home | archive sorted by: subject | author | date | reverse date
1. Oct 7 marcos alves Re: Ports request 2. Oct 7 Michael Gmelin Re: [REMINDER] Please convert your ports to the new options framework 3. Oct 7 Shane Ambler Re: Possible regression in i386 build with gcc 4.6 4. Oct 7 Jamie Paul Griffin Re: [CHANGE PROPOSAL] Moving WWW from pkg-descr to Makefile 5. Oct 7 linimon@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD unmaintained ports which are currently marked broken 6. Oct 7 linimon@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD ports which are currently marked broken 7. Oct 7 linimon@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD unmaintained ports which are currently scheduled for deletion 8. Oct 7 linimon@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD ports which are currently scheduled for deletion 9. Oct 7 linimon@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD ports which are currently marked forbidden 10. Oct 7 Michael Gmelin General usefulness of option descriptions 11. Oct 7 Marcus von Appen Re: General usefulness of option descriptions 12. Oct 7 Milan Obuch Re: General usefulness of option descriptions 13. Oct 7 Danilo Egea Zenity port update to version 3.6 and new options framework 14. Oct 7 Antonio Kless Re: FreeBSD Port: misc/mc-light 15. Oct 7 Boris Samorodov Re: FreeBSD Port: misc/mc-light 16. Oct 7 ohauer@FreeBSD.org Re: ports/171539: [patch] net-mgmt/nrpe2 small fixes 17. Oct 7 Doug Barton Re: General usefulness of option descriptions 18. Oct 7 AP Community & educational development 19. Oct 7 Tijl Coosemans Re: Possible regression in i386 build with gcc 4.6 20. Oct 8 Eitan Adler Re: General usefulness of option descriptions
21. Oct 8 Shane Ambler Re: Possible regression in i386 build with gcc 4.6 22. Oct 8 V2 by J.Magnani Secure private transactions, for all commodities. 23. Oct 8 Thomas Mueller Re: Building Ports: Is there a "make" equivalent for --batch ? 24. Oct 8 Chris Rees Re: Building Ports: Is there a "make" equivalent for --batch ? 25. Oct 8 Chris Rees Re: Building Ports: Is there a "make" equivalent for --batch ? 26. Oct 8 FreeBSD bugmaster Current unassigned ports problem reports 27. Oct 8 FreeBSD bugmaster Current problem reports assigned to ports@FreeBSD.org 28. Oct 8 O. Hartmann databases/pgadmin3: make: illegal option -- - 29. Oct 8 =?UTF-8?B?0JHQvtGA0LjRgSDQ Re: databases/pgadmin3: make: illegal option -- - 30. Oct 8 =?UTF-8?B?0JHQvtGA0LjRgSDQ Re: databases/pgadmin3: make: illegal option -- - 31. Oct 8 Andriy Gapon sysutils/ntfsprogs: problem with GNOMEVFS2 32. Oct 8 =?UTF-8?B?0JHQvtGA0LjRgSDQ Re: databases/pgadmin3: make: illegal option -- - 33. Oct 8 Kurt Jaeger Re: sysutils/ntfsprogs: problem with GNOMEVFS2 34. Oct 8 O. Hartmann Re: databases/pgadmin3: make: illegal option -- - 35. Oct 8 Max Khon Re: databases/pgadmin3: make: illegal option -- - 36. Oct 8 O. Hartmann Re: databases/pgadmin3: make: illegal option -- - 37. Oct 8 Andriy Gapon pkgng: lcms2-2.4 conflicts with lcms-1.19_1,1 38. Oct 8 Kimmo Paasiala Re: pkgng: lcms2-2.4 conflicts with lcms-1.19_1,1 39. Oct 8 =?UTF-8?B?0JHQvtGA0LjRgSDQ Re: databases/pgadmin3: make: illegal option -- - 40. Oct 8 Oliver Heesakkers Re: pkgng: lcms2-2.4 conflicts with lcms-1.19_1,1
41. Oct 8 O. Hartmann Re: databases/pgadmin3: make: illegal option -- - 42. Oct 8 Andriy Gapon Re: pkgng: lcms2-2.4 conflicts with lcms-1.19_1,1 43. Oct 8 Bryan Drewery Re: sysutils/ntfsprogs: problem with GNOMEVFS2 44. Oct 8 Ruslan Mahmatkhanov Difference in databases/firebird25-client built as root and as unprivileged user 45. Oct 9 sales@secuv.us 7 Inch Digital All in One 4 & 8CH LCD DVR 46. Oct 9 Pierre DAVID help wanted: ports for the Netmagis software 47. Oct 9 Egidijus Paliulis ports for Oracle and DB2 database servers 48. Oct 9 Volodymyr Kostyrko Re: ports for Oracle and DB2 database servers 49. Oct 9 olli hauer Re: help wanted: ports for the Netmagis software 50. Oct 9 Sales Coach The Five Steps to becoming a Sales Superstar 51. Oct 9 Patrick Lamaiziere java diablo-jdk 52. Oct 9 Patrick Lamaiziere future of packages? 53. Oct 9 Baptiste Daroussin Re: future of packages? 54. Oct 10 Jung-uk Kim Re: java diablo-jdk 55. Oct 10 Mark Linimon [HEADSUP] FYI: patch to ports that do not build with clang has been committed 56. Oct 10 jessaic Re:made glass mosaic/sample provider 57. Oct 10 Robert Backhaus net-p2p/bitcoin: How much of this sed script is actually required? 58. Oct 10 <NotaFiscalEletrônica@mail Nota Fiscal Eletrônica 59. Oct 10 Michael Reifenberger OPTIONSNG and batch compiling 60. Oct 10 Claude Buisson Re: [HEADSUP] FYI: patch to ports that do not build with clang has been committed
61. Oct 10 Guido Falsi Re: OPTIONSNG and batch compiling 62. Oct 10 Michael Reifenberger Re: OPTIONSNG and batch compiling 63. Oct 10 Michael Gmelin HAVE_GNOME vs. bsd.ports.options.mk 64. Oct 10 Baptiste Daroussin Re: HAVE_GNOME vs. bsd.ports.options.mk 65. Oct 10 Yasuhiro KIMURA Re: ports/171413: [PATCH] japanese/mecab: update to 0.994 66. Oct 10 Baptiste Daroussin Re: java diablo-jdk 67. Oct 10 Michael Gmelin Re: HAVE_GNOME vs. bsd.ports.options.mk 68. Oct 10 Baptiste Daroussin Re: HAVE_GNOME vs. bsd.ports.options.mk 69. Oct 10 Michael Gmelin Re: HAVE_GNOME vs. bsd.ports.options.mk 70. Oct 10 Alexey Kouznetsov Fwd: ports/172559: ports/sysutils/apcupsd failed to build in i386 machine with USB driver enabled 71. Oct 10 Baptiste Daroussin [HEADSUP] current switched by default to pkgng 72. Oct 10 Baptiste Daroussin [HEADSUP] IPV6 on by default 73. Oct 10 Glen Barber Re: [HEADSUP] current switched by default to pkgng 74. Oct 10 Ulrich =?utf-8?B?U3DDtnJsZ Re: General usefulness of option descriptions 75. Oct 10 Baptiste Daroussin Re: HAVE_GNOME vs. bsd.ports.options.mk 76. Oct 10 Michael Gmelin Re: HAVE_GNOME vs. bsd.ports.options.mk 77. Oct 10 Roman Divacky Re: [HEADSUP] FYI: patch to ports that do not build with clang has been committed 78. Oct 10 Alexander Un _PKGTOOLSDEFIED 79. Oct 10 Christian de Freitas Sant' FreeBSD Port: zenoss-3.1.0_1 80. Oct 10 Chris Rees Re: HAVE_GNOME vs. bsd.ports.options.mk
81. Oct 10 Jeffrey Bouquet Re: [HEADSUP] current switched by default to pkgng 82. Oct 10 Niclas Zeising Re: _PKGTOOLSDEFIED 83. Oct 10 Simon L. B. Nielsen Re: [HEADSUP] current switched by default to pkgng 84. Oct 10 Michael Gmelin Re: HAVE_GNOME vs. bsd.ports.options.mk 85. Oct 10 Jeremy Messenger Re: HAVE_GNOME vs. bsd.ports.options.mk 86. Oct 10 Jeremy Messenger Re: HAVE_GNOME vs. bsd.ports.options.mk 87. Oct 10 Baptiste Daroussin Re: [HEADSUP] current switched by default to pkgng 88. Oct 10 Eitan Adler Re: HAVE_GNOME vs. bsd.ports.options.mk 89. Oct 10 Michael Gmelin Re: HAVE_GNOME vs. bsd.ports.options.mk 90. Oct 10 Michael Gmelin Re: HAVE_GNOME vs. bsd.ports.options.mk 91. Oct 10 Jeremy Messenger Re: MATE 'base' desktop is ready for anyone to test it. 92. Oct 10 O. Hartmann svn: E175002: REPORT of '/ports/!svn/me': Could not send request: Operation not permitted (http://svn.freebsd.org) 93. Oct 10 Victor Balada Diaz Re: [HEADSUP] current switched by default to pkgng 94. Oct 10 Baptiste Daroussin Re: [HEADSUP] current switched by default to pkgng 95. Oct 10 Baptiste Daroussin Re: [HEADSUP] current switched by default to pkgng 96. Oct 10 A.J. Kehoe IV (Nanoman) Re: HAVE_GNOME vs. bsd.ports.options.mk 97. Oct 10 Matthew Seaman Re: [HEADSUP] current switched by default to pkgng 98. Oct 10 Bruce Cran Re: [HEADSUP] current switched by default to pkgng 99. Oct 10 Matthew Seaman Re: [HEADSUP] current switched by default to pkgng 100. Oct 10 Alexander Un Re: _PKGTOOLSDEFIED
101. Oct 10 Victor Balada Diaz Re: [HEADSUP] current switched by default to pkgng 102. Oct 10 Baptiste Daroussin Re: [HEADSUP] current switched by default to pkgng 103. Oct 10 Mark Linimon Re: [HEADSUP] FYI: patch to ports that do not build with clang has been committed 104. Oct 10 Mark Linimon Re: Fwd: ports/172559: ports/sysutils/apcupsd failed to build in i386 machine with USB driver enabled 105. Oct 10 Chris Rees Re: HAVE_GNOME vs. bsd.ports.options.mk 106. Oct 10 Thomas Abthorpe [HEADS UP] Ports Feature Freeze for 9.1 107. Oct 11 PC Mart Sdn Bhd (374159-W) Employee Leave Management System For UBS Payroll 108. Oct 11 Bruce Cran pkgng: perl5.12/perl5.14 conflict 109. Oct 11 Baptiste Daroussin Re: pkgng: perl5.12/perl5.14 conflict 110. Oct 11 Bruce Cran Re: pkgng: perl5.12/perl5.14 conflict 111. Oct 11 Barbara FF 16 taken offline 112. Oct 11 Florian Smeets Re: FF 16 taken offline 113. Oct 11 poeskunt69@yahoo.com I'm too shy to do this any other way. 114. Oct 11 Simon L. B. Nielsen Re: svn: E175002: REPORT of '/ports/!svn/me': Could not send request: Operation not permitted (http://svn.freebsd.org) 115. Oct 11 Data Studio =?ISO-8859-1?Q?DATA_STUDIO_-_EST=DADIO_DE_GRAVA=C7=C3O_DE_BANDAS, _JINGLES_E_SPOTS_PUBLICIT=C1RIOS.?= 116. Oct 11 Kevin Oberman Re: pkgng: perl5.12/perl5.14 conflict 117. Oct 11 Jeremy Messenger Re: HAVE_GNOME vs. bsd.ports.options.mk 118. Oct 12 Robert Backhaus net-p2p/bitcoin: How much of this sed script is actually required? 119. Oct 12 Robert Backhaus net-p2p/bitcoin: How much of this sed script is actually required? 120. Oct 12 matt Re: [HEADSUP] FYI: patch to ports that do not build with clang has been committed
121. Oct 12 Online Sales Events Overcome the Budget/Price Objection Webinar 122. Oct 12 Barbara Re: FF 16 taken offline 123. Oct 12 Miroslav Kokrda help 124. Oct 12 Claude Buisson Re: [HEADSUP] FYI: patch to ports that do not build with clang has been committed 125. Oct 12 Brett Local portsdir_path 126. Oct 12 Halmpellets straw pellets for horse bedding 127. Oct 12 Christer Solskogen VirtualBox dead slow 128. Oct 13 matt Re: [HEADSUP] FYI: patch to ports that do not build with clang has been committed 129. Oct 13 Thomas Mueller graphics/png status, when will 1.5.13 appear in ports? 130. Oct 13 Niclas Zeising Re: graphics/png status, when will 1.5.13 appear in ports? 131. Oct 13 Bob Willcox The xpdf binary is MIA with xpdf-3.03_2 132. Oct 13 Warren Block Re: The xpdf binary is MIA with xpdf-3.03_2 133. Oct 13 David Wolfskill Re: The xpdf binary is MIA with xpdf-3.03_2
home | archive sorted by: subject | author | date | reverse date