Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)


2006/freebsd-amd64/20060129.freebsd-amd64

Messages: 74, new messages first
Last update: Mon Feb 13 14:13:47 2023

home | archive sorted by: subject | author | date | reverse date
  1. Jan 28 JoaoBR                     Re: dual vs single core opteron 100's
  2. Jan 28 Ken Gunderson              Re: CPUTYPE in /etc/make.conf
  3. Jan 28 Mathieu Prevot             Re: version 6.0 and AMD64
  4. Jan 28 Armin Mohirng              amd64/92463: Buttons of USB mouse do no work under KDE 3.4.2
  5. Jan 28 FreeBSD Tinderbox          [head tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64
  6. Jan 28 Peter Jeremy               Re: Re: dual vs single core opteron 100's
  7. Jan 28 O. Hartmann                Re: dual vs single core opteron 100's
  8. Jan 28 JoaoBR                     Re: dual vs single core opteron 100's
  9. Jan 28 <lars.tunkrans@bredband.ne Re: Re: dual vs single core opteron 100's
 10. Jan 28 Andrew Pantyukhin          Re: CPUTYPE in /etc/make.conf
 11. Jan 27 Fernando Schapachnik       Re: fbsd-amd64 desktop
 12. Jan 27 Daniel Rock                Re: dual vs single core opteron 100's
 13. Jan 27 hotlips Internet admin     Re: amd64/92412: rcp.rstatd reports bogus packets/per/second info
 14. Jan 27 Matthew D. Fuller          Re: Re: dual vs single core opteron 100's
 15. Jan 27 <lars.tunkrans@bredband.ne Re: Re: dual vs single core opteron 100's
 16. Jan 27 Ken Gunderson              Re: dual vs single core opteron 100's
 17. Jan 27 Daniel Rock                Re: dual vs single core opteron 100's
 18. Jan 27 Ken Gunderson              Re: dual vs single core opteron 100's
 19. Jan 27 Daniel Rock                Re: dual vs single core opteron 100's
 20. Jan 27 hotlips Internet admin     Re: amd64/92410: calloc.c missing from Makefile.inc (fwd)


21. Jan 27 hotlips Internet admin Re: amd64/92410: calloc.c missing from Makefile.inc 22. Jan 27 hotlips Internet admin Re: amd64/92412: rcp.rstatd reports bogus packets/per/second info 23. Jan 27 Ken Gunderson Re: Is SMP included in i386? 24. Jan 27 Ken Gunderson Re: fbsd-amd64 desktop 25. Jan 27 Ken Gunderson Re: CPUTYPE in /etc/make.conf 26. Jan 27 Joseph Vella Is SMP included in i386? 27. Jan 27 Jason Evans Re: amd64/92410: calloc.c missing from Makefile.inc 28. Jan 27 Francois Tigeot Re: fbsd-amd64 desktop 29. Jan 27 Jon Kuster Re: CPUTYPE in /etc/make.conf 30. Jan 27 Joseph Koshy Re: CPUTYPE in /etc/make.conf 31. Jan 27 Morten A. Middelthon CPUTYPE in /etc/make.conf 32. Jan 27 Lennart Sorth Re: fbsd-amd64 desktop 33. Jan 27 Antoine Pelisse Re: 32-bit X libs? 34. Jan 27 James Seward Re: fbsd-amd64 desktop 35. Jan 27 Adriaan de Groot Re: fbsd-amd64 desktop 36. Jan 27 Peter Jeremy Re: fbsd-amd64 desktop 37. Jan 27 Bjoern A. Zeeb Re: amd64/92413: jail won't shut down 38. Jan 27 Danny Braniss Re: amd64/92410: calloc.c missing from Makefile.inc 39. Jan 27 Kris Kennaway Re: amd64/92412: rcp.rstatd reports bogus packets/per/second info 40. Jan 27 Kris Kennaway Re: amd64/92413: jail won't shut down
41. Jan 27 Kris Kennaway Re: amd64/92410: calloc.c missing from Makefile.inc 42. Jan 27 Bruce Becker amd64/92413: jail won't shut down 43. Jan 27 Bruce Becker amd64/92412: rcp.rstatd reports bogus packets/per/second info 44. Jan 27 Bruce Becker amd64/92410: calloc.c missing from Makefile.inc 45. Jan 27 Ken Gunderson fbsd-amd64 desktop 46. Jan 27 Mike Jakubik Re: the jem report bashes fbsd-6.0 47. Jan 27 Alexander Konovalenko Re: dual vs single core opteron 100's 48. Jan 27 Kris Kennaway Re: the jem report bashes fbsd-6.0 49. Jan 27 Ken Gunderson the jem report bashes fbsd-6.0 50. Jan 27 Kris Kennaway Re: 32-bit X libs? 51. Jan 27 Scott Long Re: 32-bit X libs? 52. Jan 27 conrads@cox.net 32-bit X libs? 53. Jan 26 O. Hartmann Re: dual vs single core opteron 100's 54. Jan 26 Brooks Davis Re: Tyan 2865 (was: dual vs single core opteron 100's) 55. Jan 26 Dieter Tyan 2865 (was: dual vs single core opteron 100's) 56. Jan 26 Clifford Cawthon amd64/92337: FreeBsd 6.0 Release Intel Pro 1000 MT em1 no buffer space available 57. Jan 25 Jeff Anton Re: dual vs single core opteron 100's 58. Jan 25 FreeBSD Tinderbox [head tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64 59. Jan 25 Matthew D. Fuller Re: dual vs single core opteron 100's 60. Jan 24 Erich Dollansky Re: dual vs single core opteron 100's
61. Jan 24 Ken Gunderson Re: Tyan GT24 - Thunder K8SRE mainboard 62. Jan 24 Richard MAHONEY Re: dual vs single core opteron 100's 63. Jan 24 Peter Jeremy Re: dual vs single core opteron 100's 64. Jan 24 Ken Gunderson Tyan K8SRE 65. Jan 24 Matthew D. Fuller Re: dual vs single core opteron 100's 66. Jan 24 Lars Tunkrans Re: dual vs single core opteron 100's 67. Jan 24 Ken Gunderson Re: dual vs single core opteron 100's 68. Jan 24 Lars Tunkrans Re: dual vs single core opteron 100's 69. Jan 24 Ken Gunderson dual vs single core opteron 100's 70. Jan 23 FreeBSD bugmaster Current problem reports assigned to you 71. Jan 22 Steve Kargl Re: amd64 vs x86_64 72. Jan 22 <pfgshield-freebsd@yahoo.c Re: amd64 vs x86_64 73. Jan 22 Steve Kargl Re: amd64 vs x86_64 74. Jan 22 <pfgshield-freebsd@yahoo.c amd64 vs x86_64


home | archive sorted by: subject | author | date | reverse date