Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 16:23:14 -0800 From: Garrett Cooper <yanegomi@gmail.com> To: Alexander Best <arundel@freebsd.org> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: status of WITHOUT_SYSINSTALL Message-ID: <AANLkTimH6S2iCR%2Bpm3=8VvB6L2YDSVfHpsVbBJpdxcSU@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20110311000938.GA12947@freebsd.org> References: <20110310235241.GA9452@freebsd.org> <AANLkTikhgHZpE5byBww2g7gG-%2BSsHgeZA-uy2qzeoamz@mail.gmail.com> <20110311000938.GA12947@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 4:09 PM, Alexander Best <arundel@freebsd.org> wrote=
:
> On Thu Mar 10 11, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 3:52 PM, Alexander Best <arundel@freebsd.org> wr=
ote:
>> > hi there,
>> >
>> > just wanted to ask what the current situation on WITHOUT_SYSINSTALL is=
? it
>> > seems the option gets completely ignored after a recent commit.
>> >
>> > should src.conf be adjusted to mention that WITHOUT_SYSINSTALL =3D=3D =
noop or
>> > should the option be completely removed?
>> >
>> > also in usr.sbin/Makefile, the sysinstall entry should be moved upward=
s to the
>> > other non-optional build directories imo.
>>
>> =A0 =A0 The build didn't even really function when specifying
>> WITHOUT_SYSINSTALL before Nate's recent commits -- so why worry about
>> the state of things?
>
> due to inconsistency? src.conf says WITHOUT_SYSINSTALL will not build
> sysinstall(1). that's obviously wrong.
I think this context was forgotten:
http://markmail.org/message/fk2xqlrtvljjo3rf
Also:
$ find /usr/src/ -name 'Makefile*' | xargs grep WITHOUT_SYSINSTALL
$ echo $?
1
$ svn info /usr/src/ | grep Revision | sed 's,Revision: ,,'
219120
Doesn't look like this sentinel is honored anywhere.
Thanks,
-Garrett
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTimH6S2iCR%2Bpm3=8VvB6L2YDSVfHpsVbBJpdxcSU>