Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 11:45:44 +0400 From: Denis Melnikov <dbmelnikov@gmail.com> To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Does ULE restrict available RAM? Message-ID: <AANLkTin%2BzJOW44tYdy5-Nm=B0Wqim9pHf4fKDEoSxch6@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201008191213.13413.jpaetzel@freebsd.org> References: <AANLkTinD4T%2BMewLfQSnXUbvTHEHx7MNwu_DAw3Y2uXnp@mail.gmail.com> <201008191213.13413.jpaetzel@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
It was a DIMM failure, just a fatal coincidence. Thank you! Denis 2010/8/19, Josh Paetzel <jpaetzel@freebsd.org>: > On Thursday 19 August 2010 04:03:40 Denis Melnikov wrote: >> Hi! >> 7.0-RELEASE (amd64) >> RAM 33 GB (8*4096+2*512) >> 2 quad-core Xeons >> >> The server ran GENERIC kernel with 4BSD scheduler earlier. When loaded >> with ULE scheduler it has missed 8GB. >> >> dmesg: >> usable memory = 26829983744 (25587 MB) >> avail memory = 25999904768 (24795 MB) >> >> # dmidecode -t 17 | grep Size >> Size: 512 MB >> Size: 4096 MB >> Size: No Module Installed >> Size: 512 MB >> Size: 4096 MB >> Size: No Module Installed >> Size: 4096 MB >> Size: 4096 MB >> Size: No Module Installed >> Size: 4096 MB >> Size: 4096 MB >> Size: No Module Installed >> >> It looks like BIOS-level problem, but... maybe ULE restricts RAM? >> >> Hopefully, >> Denis > > How much RAM does the BIOS report present? > > -- > Thanks, > > Josh Paetzel > FreeBSD -- The power to serve
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTin%2BzJOW44tYdy5-Nm=B0Wqim9pHf4fKDEoSxch6>