Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2011 17:11:02 +0000 From: "b. f." <bf1783@googlemail.com> To: Adrian Chadd <adrian@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: More if_ath churn coming your way! Message-ID: <AANLkTinkyUaR9%2Bh0VQXrjVKm728Kr1rs7Xh05YzNDh=5@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Adrian Chadd wrote: > 2011/1/22 Dima Panov <fluffy at fluffy.khv.ru>: > > > 22.01.2011, 22:19, "Adrian Chadd" <adrian.chadd at gmail.com>: > This is why I really do need this tested as much as possible. I'll put > up instructions on how to build if_ath as a module (that's what I'm > doing on my RELENG_8 EEEPC - I'm running the HEAD if_ath on it for > testing on the AR9280) and then sort out any and all issues on the > AR5416, AR9160, AR9280 and AR9285. > > Throwing 11n into the mix right now is just a bit too much for me to take on. :) Would you look to see if any of your improvements can also be used by uath(4)? b.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTinkyUaR9%2Bh0VQXrjVKm728Kr1rs7Xh05YzNDh=5>