Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 15:55:53 -0800 From: Freddie Cash <fjwcash@gmail.com> To: FreeBSD Filesystems <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: geom_sched and ZFS Message-ID: <AANLkTinzK369pnET9zkLFSg59_G8ZSKB5TV8S=%2Bbh4De@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20110204212957.GA9549@icarus.home.lan> References: <AANLkTikY15zS7YvfNfRB0unb2qYaHkyQp__YJ7_b8nUa@mail.gmail.com> <20110204172822.00006149@unknown> <20110204212957.GA9549@icarus.home.lan>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 1:29 PM, Jeremy Chadwick <freebsd@jdc.parodius.com> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 05:28:22PM +0000, Bruce Cran wrote: >> On Fri, 4 Feb 2011 08:40:03 -0800 >> Freddie Cash <fjwcash@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > Just curious if anyone has played around with geom_sched underneath >> > ZFS, and found it to be extremely worthwhile, or not worth the bother, >> > or if if it should be avoided altogether. >> >> ZFS has its own I/O scheduler so shouldn't have any use for geom_sched. >> See http://www.solarisinternals.com/wiki/index.php/ZFS_Performance for >> details. > > And furthermore, gsched greatly angers things like sysinstall. Yeah, I kinda figured it wouldn't be needed. Just curious if anyone tried it. :) -- Freddie Cash fjwcash@gmail.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTinzK369pnET9zkLFSg59_G8ZSKB5TV8S=%2Bbh4De>