Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 12:42:07 -0400 From: Ryan Stone <rysto32@gmail.com> To: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: toolchain@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ARM issue with old binutils Message-ID: <BANLkTi=qLKicHg6ZhWqR3sNpKO2PUEJ8Zg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <744CFC2C-0F17-4AED-A54A-FC93EB885FAD@bsdimp.com> References: <0C35FE0F-3301-44C6-AC40-233F6C446EBC@gmail.com> <744CFC2C-0F17-4AED-A54A-FC93EB885FAD@bsdimp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 11:39 AM, Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> wrote: > I'd be inclined to include a small patch to FreeBSD's binutils to impleme= nt this. =A0You might be able to snag it from a newer version of binutils i= f you can track down the author of that code and ask if you can include it = in a GPLv2 version of binutils. Wouldn't the FSF be the copyright owner? I thought that they required copyright assignment for contributions?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?BANLkTi=qLKicHg6ZhWqR3sNpKO2PUEJ8Zg>