Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 8 Oct 2013 17:40:23 +0200
From:      Daniel Nebdal <dnebdal@gmail.com>
To:        Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org>
Cc:        Lyndon Nerenberg <lyndon@orthanc.ca>, "freebsd-current@freebsd.org" <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
Subject:   Re: rcs
Message-ID:  <CA%2Bt49PK2-6UhOpgNUpaP9t7m6a_N7PF8yHaD-QWjLn_=gs1iOg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <52541202.3010707@mu.org>
References:  <77307DF8-637D-4295-BF47-8742F1552CE8@orthanc.ca> <20131008031517.GA31864@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <60177810-8DC4-4EA3-8040-A834B79039D2@orthanc.ca> <52538EDC.2080001@freebsd.org> <52541202.3010707@mu.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 4:09 PM, Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org> wrote:
> On 10/7/13 9:49 PM, Julian Elischer wrote:
>>
>> On 10/8/13 11:19 AM, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
>>>
>>> On 2013-10-07, at 8:15 PM, Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Maybe there was no development for 15 years.  However, the 7364
>>>> lines in ChangeLog after 2010-02-04 suggests that there may
>>>> be few bugs to worry about.
>>
>>
>> I think the fact is that most direct users of RCS use it in a very simple
>> way, and
>> it works just fine for that.  with no real need for any updates or any
>> change.
>
>
> With all due respect Julian, The more we discuss this more this really
> points to the problem that FreeBSD appears to be a challenge to install
> packages into such that a package moving out of base is such a big deal.
>
> Can we fix that instead?
>
> I mean, this change should really not be a big deal, but yet it is and this
> speaks to the core of FreeBSD utility.
>
> So again, is there a way to make it so adding RCS after install is not a big
> deal at all?
>
>
> --
> Alfred Perlstein
>


If they get the package repositories back up - which I assume will
happen before any official releases from 10 - it should just be "pkg
install rcs". As challenges go, that doesn't seem too bad?

That said, an online meta package builder *is* a nice idea, and seems
perfectly doable.

-- 
Daniel Nebdal



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CA%2Bt49PK2-6UhOpgNUpaP9t7m6a_N7PF8yHaD-QWjLn_=gs1iOg>