Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 13:08:13 +0800 From: HU Dong <itechbear@gmail.com> To: "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Should I submit a PR? Message-ID: <CAA96eVsV279MREBLjigEu=PeKNPkULp7AgGbk2XwnQAXRRGdSw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
hi, everyone!
I have been using
*deskutils/cairo-dock-2.3.0.3_2<http://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/deskutils/cairo-dock>;
* for several months and I'm happy with it. However, the newest official
version is 3.1.2.1, while the port is based on 2.3.0.3. I made a new port
with the latest version and tested it on redports.org and my machine. It
worked without any problem. But there's a problem that
*deskutils/<http://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/deskutils/cairo-dock>;
c**airo-dock-plugins-2.3.0.3_4<http://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/deskutils/cairo-dock-plugins>;
* depends on *deskutils/<http://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/deskutils/cairo-dock>;
c**airo-dock-2.3.0.3_2<http://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/deskutils/cairo-dock>;
* and I didn't manage to make a new port for it. So here's the question:
since the port system has
*deskutils/<http://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/deskutils/cairo-dock>;
c**airo-dock-2.3.0.3_2<http://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/deskutils/cairo-dock>;
*and *deskutils/<http://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/deskutils/cairo-dock>;
c*airo-dock-plugins-2.3.0.3_4<http://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/deskutils/cairo-dock-plugins>,
should I submit a PR that upgrades
*deskutils/<http://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/deskutils/cairo-dock>;
c**airo-dock-2.3.0.3_2<http://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/deskutils/cairo-dock>;
*alone?
PS. I tried to contact the maintainer reminding him to upgrade both
ports, but I didn't get any response.
F.Y.I. This page contains changelog for cairo-dock: Cairo-Dock -
ChangeLog <http://glx-dock.org/tt_changelog.php?p=1>;
--
B.R.
HU Dong
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAA96eVsV279MREBLjigEu=PeKNPkULp7AgGbk2XwnQAXRRGdSw>