Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2017 08:13:08 -0400 From: Jordan Caraballo <jordancaraballo87@gmail.com> To: Navdeep Parhar <nparhar@gmail.com> Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?Olivier_Cochard=2DLabb=C3=A9?= <olivier@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Net <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>, John Jasen <jjasen@gmail.com> Subject: Re: state of packet forwarding in FreeBSD? Message-ID: <CABoP_SQ0X0KsDV4M0aZ7qbMM-07UkoG=5FEGB4Lb7RZnOLHc9w@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <3b3ecffa-36e5-75b1-2b25-db9e9dcd45ba@gmail.com> References: <CAACLuR17yRETErqsxbdhBPJrjQur0oMVOqvL5ZCkmjLCKkHLNA@mail.gmail.com> <CA%2Bq%2BTcqsTey1hXdyJJRWt--%2Bx3HJ6QaMoLaTLFsCh1GiwEN7UA@mail.gmail.com> <CAPFoGT-QecdQX9mM_6MM9veqHgQOPiPxBX5uU8VBFArVX_iYyw@mail.gmail.com> <CA%2Bq%2BTcoY5ydKfP7_6wpjzGKPOq_O4%2BWmuuB9Nw1WO81WLcU0Kg@mail.gmail.com> <3b3ecffa-36e5-75b1-2b25-db9e9dcd45ba@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi guys, We tried multiple attempts to implement netmap vale-ctl and bridge in chelsio vcxl* interfaces. The most interesting attempts, are mentioned below. First Attempt: Ran "./bridge vcxl0 vcxl1"; but it would complain about having a 0 burst size. Added "-b 1024" to the command as recommended by the log from the script, but the issue was still present. Second Attempt: Tried to combine vale-ctl and bridge by: # ./vale -h vale0:vcxl0 # ./vale -h vale0:vcxl1 # ./bridge vale0:1 vale0:3 There was no error, however, traffic did not flow at the time of shooting packets to the interfaces. Third Attempt: By following this email threadhttps://lists.openinfosecfoundation.org/pipermail/oisf-users/2015-Oct= ober/005310.html; we ran: # ./vale-ctl -n b0 # ./vale-ctl -n b1 # ./vale-ctl -a vale0:b0 # ./vale-ctl -a vale0:vcxl0 # ./vale-ctl -a vale1:b1 # ./vale-ctl -a vale1:vcxl1 # ./bridge -i netmap:vcxl0 -i netmap:vcxl1 Same result as before, no errors, yet no traffic in the interfaces. Any feedback or advice on why traffic is not flowing? We would like to note that throwing packets to the vcxl interfaces without any netmap aware application ranges from 1.1M to 1.2M pps. Is this supposed to happen? (We consider that still, the number is quite lo= w) - Jordan 2017-06-15 17:15 GMT-04:00 Navdeep Parhar <nparhar@gmail.com>: > On 06/14/2017 10:42, Olivier Cochard-Labb=C3=A9 wrote: > >> On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 7:36 PM, Navdeep Parhar <nparhar@gmail.com >> <mailto:nparhar@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> >> I think I fixed this a long time back. Have you tried recently? We >> moved the netmap functionality to the vcxl interfaces and it should >> just work. >> >> =E2=80=8B >> It stills panic with an -head build today. >> >> > Fixed in r319986. > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > --=20 Jordan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CABoP_SQ0X0KsDV4M0aZ7qbMM-07UkoG=5FEGB4Lb7RZnOLHc9w>