Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2017 15:31:24 -0800 From: Lee Brown <leeb@ratnaling.org> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: openldap-client vs openldap-sasl-client (Miroslav Lachman) Message-ID: <CAFPNf5_y2OC0qb7z94NSSLou0WKcGVmp3=e6n_4r4AvwqT15Og@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Jan Bramkamp wrote on 2017/01/05 11:30: > > On 04/01/2017 18:32, Andriy Gapon wrote: > >> > >> Do you I understand correctly that it is impossible now to install > >> both samba44 > >> and libreoffice using the official FreeBSD package repository? > >> Or samba44 and KDE? > >> > >> If yes, then that sucks... > > > > Yes and yes it sucks. The "solution" is to build your own repo and set > > the right flags to always use the same LDAP client port. With binary > > packages and the speed of modern x86_64 systems I for one no longer see > > removing SASL support from OpenLDAP as useful enough to justify the > > complexity. Are there any reasons other than saved build time to disable > > this dependency (e.g. a bad security track record/process, different > > licenses)? > > And what is the right way to choose SASL / NON-SASL version globaly? > We are building packages in our poudriere, but I cannot find the proper > variable / option for this. > > Miroslav Lachman (sorry for losing the headers, I had to copy/paste this as I switched from digest to individual). Is there a satisfactory answer to Miroslav's question? I'm in the same predicament, I can't upgrade anything without removing libreoffice, presumably because of samba. I've tried looking through the tree of options for libreoffice and samba, but I'm at a loss.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAFPNf5_y2OC0qb7z94NSSLou0WKcGVmp3=e6n_4r4AvwqT15Og>