Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2013 20:09:10 -0400 From: Aryeh Friedman <aryeh.friedman@gmail.com> To: linimon@freebsd.org Cc: bsdic@microsoft.com, freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/182209: [new port] misc/hyperv-ic: Ports containing Hyper-V integration components for FreeBSD Message-ID: <CAGBxaXnqJmp=tzwV7KzFMPNQGCQXQXbsRxFjU3-dqBHAqVim4A@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201309292316.r8TNGgFR070061@freefall.freebsd.org> References: <201309292316.r8TNGgFR070061@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
General question on the category: There are a significant number of virtualization ports in emulators. Emulators seems to be more about emulating hardware that is not present instead of virtualizing the existing hardware. Given that why not create a category for virtualization? On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 7:16 PM, <linimon@freebsd.org> wrote: > Old Synopsis: Ports containing Hyper-V integration components for FreeBSD > New Synopsis: [new port] misc/hyperv-ic: Ports containing Hyper-V > integration components for FreeBSD > > State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback > State-Changed-By: linimon > State-Changed-When: Sun Sep 29 23:15:12 UTC 2013 > State-Changed-Why: > Fix synosis. > > Note to submitter: I have substituted 'misc' as the category. 'kld' > is a virtual category and cannot be used for a primary category (e.g. > there is no ports/kld/ directory.) > > Is there another physical category you think might be better? > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=182209 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-ports-bugs-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAGBxaXnqJmp=tzwV7KzFMPNQGCQXQXbsRxFjU3-dqBHAqVim4A>