Date: Thu, 9 May 2013 15:48:34 -0700 From: Garrett Cooper <yaneurabeya@gmail.com> To: ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Dag=2DErling_Sm=F8rgrav?= <des@freebsd.org> Subject: Why doesn't USE_UNZIP use the base system unzip? Message-ID: <CAGHfRMC7_YVV7Ua=UpXEFjd5xWPCjgaLHE9C2XFy5KSXNgV-PA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
So... trying to trim down dependencies in a ports build and I'm
confused as to why unzip in base (it's been in base for ~5 years)
isn't a sufficient replacement for archivers/unzip in ports. It
doesn't seem like we're doing anything incredibly complicated with
archivers/unzip, so I would think that it would be a drop-in
replacement. Am I incorrect?
Thanks,
-Garrett
PS Please CC me as I'm not currently subscribed to the list.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAGHfRMC7_YVV7Ua=UpXEFjd5xWPCjgaLHE9C2XFy5KSXNgV-PA>