Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 17:54:27 -0700 From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> To: Kaho Toshikazu <kaho@elam.kais.kyoto-u.ac.jp> Cc: "freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org" <freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Centrino Wireless-N 1000 support is also broken (Re: iwn(4) in -HEAD supporting Centrino Wireless-N 135) Message-ID: <CAJ-Vmo=0t%2BzoJ0HwArHkQnpBbHas5WiKj%2Be9y_T3SFsFsuiewA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <84650.1398819225@elam.kais.kyoto-u.ac.jp> References: <CAJ-Vmo=y77Eh9CCevN4cAWn23SZ1cG=gCq9YMPeJ4xeP6j77Gw@mail.gmail.com> <20140226123709.GA31099@syn.pertho.net> <CAJ-Vmom=b5tPTh1qWNG=zV5qM=Wzf1BRe5%2B2-ndrR648NSFmkw@mail.gmail.com> <530EE7F4.3080903@shurik.kiev.ua> <CAJ-VmomsEdS5nm8rX6245rAEhVxWeOc4aO9AYrmEBHuUKHG=Tw@mail.gmail.com> <24791.1393550277@elam.kais.kyoto-u.ac.jp> <CAJ-Vmo=wZyMM1uWTyFV=Yb3vd=EmfiW_NY5Vp1c-JmV5hF2ENA@mail.gmail.com> <75498.1398751548@elam.kais.kyoto-u.ac.jp> <CAJ-VmokVPA0rQSwins3NuppV%2B2ypYLCTF0nFGeU828GLpPp2KQ@mail.gmail.com> <84650.1398819225@elam.kais.kyoto-u.ac.jp>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ok, this is much, much clearer. I'll go look at r258035, which is the new chip config stuff. -a On 29 April 2014 17:53, Kaho Toshikazu <kaho@elam.kais.kyoto-u.ac.jp> wrote: > Hello, thank you for your reply. > >> Would you mind clarifying what you wrote a little more? >> What I'm reading this as: >> >> * If I grab an r258030 tree, it's broken on your NIC >> * If I then do what, apply r258034, it works? >> * If I apply 258035 -> 258085, it also works? >> >> I really would appreciate it if you would re-state what you've written >> so I/we can better understand :-) >> >> Something like: >> >> * Revision X, doesn't work >> * Revision X with revisions A, B and then C applied, does work >> * Revision X with A, B and C applied, and a modified revision D >> applied, does work (and attach the modified revision D) >> >> That way I/we can clearly reproduce what you've done. :-) >> >> Thanks! > > I'm sorry for my ambiguous representation. > > Until Revision 257951, work. > > From r258030 to r258034, doesn't work. If antmask_2stream set to > be IWN_ANT_AB, work. > > After r258035, doesn't work. antmask_2stream = IWN_ANT_AB doesn't help. > >> Ok. So r258030 changed the antenna configuration for transmitting to >> use the tx chainmask from the EEPROM settings,r ather than hard-coding >> it to IWN_ANT_AB. This is needed because a bunch of NICs actually >> don't have two antennas and if you feed it IWN_ANT_AB it just plainly >> doesn't work. >> >> So, if you try -HEAD, but you set antmask_2stream to be IWN_ANT_AB, >> does it fix the problem? >> >> Ie, add this line >> >> linkq.antmsk_2stream = IWN_ANT_AB; >> >> .. just after this line: >> >> linkq.ampdu_limit = htole16(4000); > > Yes, it fix the problem until r258034, but doesn't fix after r258035. > Rivision 258035 changed many lines and if_iwn_chip_cfg.h was created. > I faced a trouble about where should I try to change. > > -- > Kaho Toshikazu
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-Vmo=0t%2BzoJ0HwArHkQnpBbHas5WiKj%2Be9y_T3SFsFsuiewA>