Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2012 17:00:33 -0500 From: alexus <alexus@gmail.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports vs packages Message-ID: <CAJxePNKkFGbfcvUV=SPSV8PiQ4aqpc54fYOCLb6kbn_R84xqrw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <083a01cccf07$79fd35e0$6df7a1a0$@fisglobal.com> References: <CAJxePN%2BWrr6K83RGFGERzJGUXc24i95BemPOgxqAJW_2Lsfjpg@mail.gmail.com> <07e401cccefb$364338b0$a2c9aa10$@fisglobal.com> <CAHieY7RL5wf=Tk7-9KafudTFYbTHtXh9Ap9rDyVCM=5qEFN4ew@mail.gmail.com> <083a01cccf07$79fd35e0$6df7a1a0$@fisglobal.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thank you so much for this wonderful feedback! One of the things I'm seeing is that unfortunately packages are somewhat limited vs ports... For example: I'm trying to get Apache httpd + PHP to work, after pkg_add -r php5, php5 doesn't have libphp5.so that links Apache and PHP together... so unless I'm doing something entirely wrong I basically must use ports and nothing else to get the functionality i need... -- http://alexus.org/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJxePNKkFGbfcvUV=SPSV8PiQ4aqpc54fYOCLb6kbn_R84xqrw>