Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 19 May 2021 18:42:08 +0530
From:      "Kamal R. Prasad" <kamalpr@gmail.com>
To:        Kyle Evans <kevans@freebsd.org>
Cc:        freebsd-arm <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: bcm2835
Message-ID:  <CAK=yUG%2BxYtnKqPfKs10L-4nAtrNeuqcrR5Lp1zi5R9z2gHiWmg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CACNAnaGP=CgUZ6%2BGuNV5bREMOGtNPyqb9XKVSWb4_sLT4kO=jg@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <CAK=yUGKJcBoLwXWJV_zdondw3RfqDDS3QH9JVmsV=V37qUbJRw@mail.gmail.com> <CACNAnaGP=CgUZ6%2BGuNV5bREMOGtNPyqb9XKVSWb4_sLT4kO=jg@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi!

can you tell me more on why removing it was a problem for rpi3 or
rpi4? i am trying to understand the significance of this #define.

thanks
-kamal


On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 6:08 PM Kyle Evans <kevans@freebsd.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 12:27 AM Kamal R. Prasad <kamalpr@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > hello,
> >
> > in file
> > sys/arm/broadcom/bcm2835/bcm2835_sdhci.c
> >
> > there is a constant
> > SDHCI_QUIRK_BROKEN_TIMEOUT_VAL
> > can someone tell me why this was introduced and does it correspond to
> > anything in the datasheet?
> >
>
> Hi,
>
> This was added by gonzo@ back in r242321. It doesn't really correspond
> to anything in the datasheet, but before I committed r354560 that
> moved it around I did try to remove it and observed that it was still
> a problem with either the RPi3 or RPi4.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Kyle Evans



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAK=yUG%2BxYtnKqPfKs10L-4nAtrNeuqcrR5Lp1zi5R9z2gHiWmg>