Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2015 12:58:21 -0700 From: Chris Stankevitz <chrisstankevitz@gmail.com> To: jungle Boogie <jungleboogie0@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: FreeBSD recommends not using base unbound for an authoritative server Message-ID: <CAPi0pssb%2BRsyK6R-C4bM4Ljx7fjsjt_9VXf_gte%2B=j9XzyiNSg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAPi0psurwfKixg3S_pQ7_a9QOCJ2yTBqQncxHB75nzX-%2BnZszw@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAPi0pssPrcJgF71AvQ-M1RZt=%2Btv=6FTGtwhi9_bX6-Q-7b7cQ@mail.gmail.com> <5508B8EB.3050907@gmail.com> <CAPi0psuy1swnCB%2B5NQbPrAAA=E3E377CcOPvvez%2Be4Ze6zuVZQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAKE2PDvy7CRW_O_XR9oHtHBe8gO9THVGGz1BdN6dPbZSGk8etA@mail.gmail.com> <CAPi0psurwfKixg3S_pQ7_a9QOCJ2yTBqQncxHB75nzX-%2BnZszw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 12:49 PM, Chris Stankevitz <chrisstankevitz@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm still left wondering why the FreeBSD handbook recommends favoring > ports over base when running an externally visible unbound server. Turns out, just as Stephen had explained, unbound claims it cannot be used as an authoritative server. So I will be using bind or nsd. The issue is moot and I no longer feel the need to have the question answered. Thank you all for your help, Chris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAPi0pssb%2BRsyK6R-C4bM4Ljx7fjsjt_9VXf_gte%2B=j9XzyiNSg>