Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1998 23:44:58 +0100 From: Gary Jennejohn <garyj@peedub.muc.de> To: freebsd-isdn@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ITK Support Message-ID: <199812142244.XAA05201@peedub.muc.de> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 13 Dec 1998 19:35:44 %2B0100." <000101be26c7$64ed8e30$53cb08d4@hwart.teuto.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Martin Husemann" writes: >Markus Döhr wrote: > >> Are there any problems with implementing active cards? I read something >> about time critical things long time ago in a Linux list, but I'm not very >> into this stuff... > >No, no real problems if (a) the interface to the card is documented, (b) the >interface is reasonable and (c) the card behaves like the docs promise. > the real problem is that a lot of active cards require a CAPI interface, which we do not have (yet). Implementing a CAPI in a reasonable manner and interfacing it to the existing i4b structure is a problem which is being worked on (I have to get this going to support the AVM B1). --- Gary Jennejohn Home - garyj@muc.de Work - garyj@fkr.dec.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isdn" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199812142244.XAA05201>