Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2000 14:27:27 +1030 From: Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com> To: Erik Stainsby <stainsby@telus.net> Cc: Andrzej Bialecki <abial@webgiro.com>, Michael Larsen <mlarsen@tech-nic.net>, Roger Hardiman <roger@cs.strath.ac.uk>, small@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: PicoBSD changes for 4.0-current Message-ID: <20000130142727.G55643@freebie.lemis.com> In-Reply-To: <000b01bf6ad5$f157baa0$c619c2cf@ws1> References: <000b01bf6ad5$f157baa0$c619c2cf@ws1>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Saturday, 29 January 2000 at 19:56:07 -0800, Erik Stainsby wrote: >> Given the recent discussion about maintainers in general, I think we >> should only have maintainers for those products where one person does >> the bulk (> 75%) of the work. I don't think PicoBSD fits into this >> category, so I'd suggest that we don't have a maintainer. > > Fair enough, perhaps but the gist of the question still ought to be > addressed, don't you think? Idem est, who should be the agent/rep > for posting changes into the tree ? I thought that did address it. If you have a change to PicoBSD and you're a committer, commit it. If you're not a committer, find a committer. In either case, it makes sense to discuss modifications on this list first. Greg -- Finger grog@lemis.com for PGP public key See complete headers for address and phone numbers To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-small" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000130142727.G55643>