Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2000 23:27:48 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@ceid.upatras.gr> To: Cliff Sarginson <cliff@raggedclown.net> Cc: Erik Trulsson <ertr1013@student.uu.se>, questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Root and the C Shell Message-ID: <20001210232747.B2878@hades.hell.gr> In-Reply-To: <00121019403703.01067@buffy>; from cliff@raggedclown.net on Sun, Dec 10, 2000 at 07:40:37PM %2B0100 References: <00121017490501.01067@buffy> <20001210180621.A20292@student.uu.se> <00121019403703.01067@buffy>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Dec 10, 2000 at 07:40:37PM +0100, Cliff Sarginson wrote: > > I am not used to seeing /usr/local used to profliagtely on the Unix systems > I work on .. ah well.. Well, nothing from the `base system' should go under /usr/local or something is very wrong with your installation. I find the FreeBSD semantics very clear in this matter. "What comes from /usr/src and the base system sources eventually ends up under /usr somewhere, when installed. What comes from the ports, ends up being installed somewhere under /usr/local." Seems ok to me. - giorgos To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001210232747.B2878>