Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2000 16:53:27 +0200 (CEST) From: Eric Masson <e-masson@kisoft-services.com> To: "Jim King" <king@sstar.com> Cc: <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: sio interrupt handler problem Message-ID: <14597.45415.131516.431525@localhost.nantes.kisoft-services.com> In-Reply-To: <001301bfaebe$5717cca0$a44b8486@jking> References: <5564.000424@pd.chel.ru> <20000424114057.A692@pir.net> <14596.37283.563515.214828@localhost.nantes.kisoft-services.com> <003801bfae25$39a6d100$a44b8486@jking> <14597.37879.611136.906144@localhost.nantes.kisoft-services.com> <001301bfaebe$5717cca0$a44b8486@jking>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Jim King writes: >You need to patch the code that sets the FIFO receive trigger level. I >think all you did was change the number that gets printed when the port is >probed. :-( > >Look for a line like: > com->fifo_image = t->c_ospeed <= 4800 ? FIFO_ENABLE : FIFO_ENABLE | >FIFO_RX_HIGH; > >Change the "FIFO_RX_HIGH" to "FIFO_RX_MEDH". I applied your change, i still encounter SOs but my TP seems to recover much faster from them. That makes modem much more useable. Thanks for the tip Regards Eric -- Opinions stated below are mine and can't be considered as official Kisoft Services policy. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?14597.45415.131516.431525>